Clashing Over Commerce: A History of US Trade PolicyShould the United States be open to commerce with other countries, or should it protect domestic industries from foreign competition? This question has been the source of bitter political conflict throughout American history. Such conflict was inevitable, James Madison argued in The Federalist Papers, because trade policy involves clashing economic interests. The struggle between the winners and losers from trade has always been fierce because dollars and jobs are at stake: depending on what policy is chosen, some industries, farmers, and workers will prosper, while others will suffer. Douglas A. Irwin’s Clashing over Commerce is the most authoritative and comprehensive history of US trade policy to date, offering a clear picture of the various economic and political forces that have shaped it. From the start, trade policy divided the nation—first when Thomas Jefferson declared an embargo on all foreign trade and then when South Carolina threatened to secede from the Union over excessive taxes on imports. The Civil War saw a shift toward protectionism, which then came under constant political attack. Then, controversy over the Smoot-Hawley tariff during the Great Depression led to a policy shift toward freer trade, involving trade agreements that eventually produced the World Trade Organization. Irwin makes sense of this turbulent history by showing how different economic interests tend to be grouped geographically, meaning that every proposed policy change found ready champions and opponents in Congress. As the Trump administration considers making major changes to US trade policy, Irwin’s sweeping historical perspective helps illuminate the current debate. Deeply researched and rich with insight and detail, Clashing over Commerce provides valuable and enduring insights into US trade policy past and present. |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administration agreed agricultural allowed American argued authority average barriers began believed benefit bill Britain British called cause commerce Committee competition Congress consumers continued costs cotton countries debate decline demand Democrats Department developing dollar domestic early economic effect election established existing exports favor feared final firms force foreign give growth higher House import duties imposed included increase industry interests iron issue Japan labor later legislation less limited lower major manufacturing materials Means measure ment NAFTA negotiations North noted objective opposed particularly party passed percent period political ports position president production proposed protection provision raise rates reciprocity reduce representatives Republicans restrictions result Round Senate share ships South steel tariff textile tion trade agreements trade policy United vote wanted workers