Pornography, Feminism, and the Individual
Arguing that efforts to ban pornography are ultimately doomed to failure, radical philosopher Alison Assiter takes issue with recent feminist analyses of pornography by Dworkin, Griffin and Kappeler. She demonstrates how close are the parallels between the radical feminist analysis and more conventional liberal perspectives, in their common stress on the primacy of the individual. By limiting the terms of the argument to those of patriarchy - as contemporary analysts have tended to do - we fail, she says, to grasp the true nature of oppression. Any proposed solutions to the problem of pornography will only be partial and unattainable, until such time as we come to terms with the fact that banning pornography cannot obliterate the ills that pornography exemplifies. Only when those wider ills have been more fully identified and understood can we begin to eliminate oppression, exploitation and inequality in all their forms.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
according action allow appear argue argument autonomy becomes behaviour believe body chapter child claim collective conception concern connection constitute constraints criticized cultural defended described desire domination Dworkin equal example expression fact fantasy feeling female feminist freedom freedom of speech give Griffin harm heroine human Ibid idea important individual individualist instance interests involves Kappeler less liberal liberty lives London look magazines male male power means Mills and Boon moral mother natural needs novels object one's Penthouse person perspective picture pleasure porn pornography position possible present Press production question radical rape rational reader reason relations removed representation represented responsible role romance says seen sense sexual social society story suggests thinking thought treated true values violence wants Williams Report woman women writing wrong