 | Edward Burtenshaw Sugden - Vendors and purchasers - 1818 - 862 pages
...lot. If the parol evidence were admissible in this case, he knew of no instance where a party might not, by parol testimony, superadd any term to a written agreement, which would be setting aside all Britten contracts, and rendering them of no effect. There (/) 2 Blackst. 1249. v. Clowes, 15 Ves. Jun.... | |
 | Samuel March Phillipps - Evidence (Law) - 1820 - 838 pages
...for the lot. If the parol evidence were ad missible in this ease, in what instance might not a part; by parol testimony super-add any term to a written agreement? which would besetting aside all written contracts, and rendering them of no effect. There is no doubt, that the... | |
 | Edward Burtenshaw Sugden - Estates (Law) - 1822 - 1028 pages
...lot. If the parol evidence were admissible in this case, he knew of no instance where a party might not, by parol testimony, superadd any term to a written...contracts, and rendering them of no effect. There was no doubt, his Lordship added, that the warranty as (0 2 Blackst. 1249. r. Clowes, 15 Ves. jun.... | |
 | Richard Babington - Auctions - 1826 - 298 pages
...was the whole balance remaining unpaid : and upon a motion for a new trial, Lord Ellenborough said, "There is no doubt that the parol evidence was properly...of timber would vary the agreement contained in the printed conditions of sale. The only question which could be made is, whether if by a collateral representation... | |
 | Thomas Starkie - Evidence (Law) - 1826 - 708 pages
...evidence were admissible, in what PART instance might not a party, by parol testimony, superadd iv. any term to a written agreement, which would be setting...written contracts, and rendering them of no effect. In such cases it is to be presumed that the parties, in expressing their intention, have expressed... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, James Manning, Thomas Colpitts Granger - Election law - 1842 - 1050 pages
...time of sale warranted a certain quantity was held inadmissible. Lord Ellenborough CJ there said, " If the parol evidence were admissible in this case,...written contracts and rendering them of no effect." So in Yates v. Pirn (c), where bacon sold to the plaintiff had (a) S Wils. 275. (c) 6 Taunt. 446. been... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, James Manning, Thomas Colpitts Granger - Election law - 1842 - 1056 pages
...time of sale warranted a certain quantity was held inadmissible. Lord Ellenborough CJ there said, " If the parol evidence were admissible in this case,...written contracts and rendering them of no effect." So in Yaies v. Pirn (c), where bacon sold to the plaintiff had (a) 3 Wilt. 275. (c) 6 Taunt. 446. been... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Scott - Law reports, digests, etc - 1842 - 830 pages
...inadmissible, as varying the written contract. " If the parol evidence," says Lord Ellenborough, " were admissible in this case, I know of no instance...written contracts, and rendering them of no effect." So in Yatea v. Pim, 6 Taunt. 446, where a question arose upon a warranty of bacon sold to the plaintiff... | |
 | Thomas Starkie - Evidence (Law) - 1842 - 1186 pages
...in that case, observed, that if such evidence were admissible, in what instance might not a party, by parol testimony, superadd any term to a written...written contracts, and rendering them of no effect. In such cases it is to be presumed that the parties, in expressing their intention, have expressed... | |
| |
The purchaser ought to have had it reduced into writing at the time, if the representation then made as to the quantity swayed him to bid for the lot. If the parol evidence were admissible in this case, I know of no instance where a party may not by parol... 
