Supreme Court1928 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 1
... jury on May 6 , 1927 , and resulted in a directed verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $ 20,053.15 . Judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant was entered on or about May 12 , 1927 , in the sum of $ 20,180.50 ...
... jury on May 6 , 1927 , and resulted in a directed verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $ 20,053.15 . Judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant was entered on or about May 12 , 1927 , in the sum of $ 20,180.50 ...
Page 49
... jury retired in charge of an officer sworn for that purpose , and return and say they find a verdict in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant for the sum of Two Thousand Five Hundred ( $ 2,500.00 ) dollars . The jury also an ...
... jury retired in charge of an officer sworn for that purpose , and return and say they find a verdict in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant for the sum of Two Thousand Five Hundred ( $ 2,500.00 ) dollars . The jury also an ...
Page 55
... jury , and the action having been duly tried , and the jury having rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant in the sum of $ 2,500.00 and the costs of the plaintiff having been taxed at the sum of $ 147.95 ...
... jury , and the action having been duly tried , and the jury having rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant in the sum of $ 2,500.00 and the costs of the plaintiff having been taxed at the sum of $ 147.95 ...
Page 61
... jury , at Trial Term , Part I hereof . Said jury on the 23rd day of March , 1928 , rendered a verdict in behalf of plaintiff in the sum of $ 2,500 . This verdict was rendered 63 subject to the opinion of the court . As a matter of law ...
... jury , at Trial Term , Part I hereof . Said jury on the 23rd day of March , 1928 , rendered a verdict in behalf of plaintiff in the sum of $ 2,500 . This verdict was rendered 63 subject to the opinion of the court . As a matter of law ...
Page 67
... jury , and the jury having ren- dered its verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of Twenty- five hundred ( $ 2500 ) Dollars ; and thereafter upon an order to show cause dated March 26th , 69 1928 , and ...
... jury , and the jury having ren- dered its verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of Twenty- five hundred ( $ 2500 ) Dollars ; and thereafter upon an order to show cause dated March 26th , 69 1928 , and ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
81 coats agreed agreement alleged answer appeal assured attorneys binder Bovard Broadway C. F. Ahlstrom charge claim complaint contract corporation counsel County damages defendant Defendant's Exhibit Defendant's Witness Dollars Emanuel L evidence fact fendant furs Hall & Henshaw Harris hereby home office Honor immaterial Insurance Company inventory January Joseph jury Katz Keiler KINGS COUNTY lessee lessor letter loss Major Kirby marked Plaintiff's Exhibit ment merchandise Mitchell motion Nathan Objection overruled Objection sustained offer offset presses pany Plaintiff Cross Plaintiff-Direct Plaintiff's Witness position Potter Company Potter Printing Company Potter Printing Press Premier & Potter premises Press Company purchaser question ready for power Rosing & Cohn Suffern talk tell Terry testimony thereof tion told trial vendor verdict vice president W. W. Kirby warranty Wasserman watchman York York City York Supreme Court