Page images
PDF
EPUB

nations to go up the Dardanelles : she was bound not to permit the vessels of Russia to come out of the Black Sea. He did not mean to say, that this provision might not be in some respects advantageous to Russia. In time of war it might tend to defend Russia from the attack of a hostile fleet. But the offensive supposition entertained in the first instance, that Russia was to call upon Turkey to close the Dardanelles at pleasure against any other vessels but Russian, had been entirely done away by the explanations subsequently given. The right hon. Baronet had asked, what his Majesty's Government had gained by acquiescing in the treaty? They had never acquiesced in it; they had stated their dissatisfaction with portions of it. It was in his (Mr. Stanley's) power, but as a Minister, he felt that he ought not at present to do so, to detail the satisfactory explanations which had been received on the subject. The plain state of the case was this:-For the purpose of protecting Constantinople against Mehemet Ali, which his Majesty's Govern

would not otherwise have enjoyed." Now, if the treaty which Russia concluded with Turkey had been of the character supposed by the right hon. Baronet, his Majesty's Government would have had every right to complain. When they were acting in a spirit of perfect confidence towards an ally, that ally would have had no right to conclude a secret treaty-a treaty without their knowledge or concurrence-for the purpose of forwarding his own particular purposes. If such an act had been committed, it would have been a great breach of faith, not at all discreditable to England, but highly discreditable to Russia. But, although the treaty did not bear the character which the right hon. Baronet imputed to it, the British Government thought it right strongly to express their sense of the unsatisfactory nature of some of its provisions, and to require explanations concerning them. With respect to the Dardanelles, the explanations both from Russia and Turkey had gone far to remove the most powerful objection which was supposed to exist against the treaty, namely, that in time of war the Dardan-ment, notwithstanding the right hon. Baelles were to be shut against some nations, but open to others. Now they had the strongest assurances, both from Turkey and from Russia, that in the passage of the Dardanelles no advantage was to be enjoyed by Russian armed vessels over the armed vessels of any other nation; and that, in time of war, the passage was to be absolutely closed against ships of war of all nations. The right hon. Baronet had spoken of the treaty as if it were one of-vernment to be very objectionable, remonfensive and defensive between Russia and Turkey, and as if Turkey had bound herself to close the Dardanelles whenever she should be required to do so by Russia. But what were in fact the terms of the treaty? That Russia and Turkey being in perfect amity, in time of peace the Dar-treated his Majesty's Government on this danelles were to remain free; but that, in time of war no armed vessel belonging either to Russia, or to any other power, should be allowed to pass. But what was gained by Russia in consequence of this arrangement?-In time of war Turkey was bound by the treaty to close the Dardanelles against the fleets of any and every nation. Before she concluded that treaty, Turkey possessed the power of closing the Dardanelles to both, or to either of two belligerents. By the treaty she was bound to close it to both belligerents. She was bound not to permit the vessels of other

ronet's supposition, were anxious to do, the Russian force being in readiness, entered Constantinople. Having afforded assistance to the Sultan, and England and France having combined in requiring Mehemet Ali to proceed no further, Russia withdrew from Constantinople. In the meanwhile, however, she had concluded a treaty with Russia; and a portion of that treaty appearing to his Majesty's Go

strances were made by this country and France, and explanations had been received which, though in a great measure satisfactory, were not wholly at an end. His noble friend, acknowledging the courtesy with which the House had hitherto

subject, expressed his confident persuasion that the House would not take any step which might compromise the honour and dignity of the Government, and, therefore, would not call upon his Majesty's Ministers for the premature disclosure of a negotiation which had not yet been completed.

Mr. Cutlar Fergusson said, with respect to the treaty of the 8th of July, the House must come to the conclusion that it was not satisfactory, else why refuse to produce it? At the time when the noble Lord was addressing the House on this

subject on a former occasion, a treaty had been secretly and surreptitiously entered into between Russia and Turkey, which it was found bore very hard upon the interests of this country, and strongly in favour of Russia, the worst Power in Europe. It appeared to him that, if the treaty was in itself of a suspicious nature, no explanation of these two Powers ought to induce this country to sanction it. He thought that the papers called for ought to be laid on the Table, but if the noble Lord thought otherwise, he for one would not press for their production at present. If the Russian ships of war were to pass the Dardanelles to the exclusion of men of war of other nations, he should like to know what construction was to be put upon that?

Mr. Secretary Stanley rose to explain. It had been stated in the treaty, that no foreign ships of war were to be allowed to pass the Dardanelles, and upon inquiring whether Russian men of war were included in the words "foreign ships of war," the answer was decidedly the affirmative.

to Ibraham Pacha, we might, he believed, by our fleets have prevented his invasion of Turkey; but as he had no positive information upon this part of the case, he would not attempt to implicate Government upon slight grounds. There was one great difficulty under which a British House of Commons always laboured when they required information to be laid before them. If the negotiation were still pending, they were told that the demand for information was premature, and would, if complied with, be subversive of all the objects which Ministers had in view. But if the negotiation were at an end, then they were told that all was over, and that it would be irritating and productive of unpleasant feeling to rip old matters up again. He wished to say one word or two, to which he begged the attention of the noble Lord, the Chancellor of the Exchequer. It was a question of great importance, and one in which the feelings of all classes in this country were interested. He alluded to the case of Poland. He did not ask his Majesty's Ministers to alter the policy they had pursued with respect to that persecuted and unhappy country beyond this. There were at present in these kingdoms numbers of those unfortunate patriots, who had been driven from their native soil by a Prince under whom they lived, under a treaty to which this country gave a guarantee. They were driven by persecution to insurrection and revolt, the treaty was violated and tram

Mr. Cutlar Fergusson proceeded Where, he would ask, was Russia most vulnerable? Certainly in the Black Sea, the great resort of her ships of war. But, in the event of a war, in stepped Turkey, and said, "We'll throw the shield of our mantle around you, and protect you where you are most vulnerable." If it should be the case that the Dardanelles were now rendered impregnable by the aid of Russian engineers, would this not be of itself a vio-pled upon, as were the unfortunate Poles lation of the treaty? Would it not amount to an act of cowardice on the part of Russia? But if this were so, if fortifications had been carried on on the land side, as well as on the Straits, it was impossible that any ship could pass without the permission of Russia. It was the duty of this country to guard itself against the domineering power of Russia, who was in fact aiming a vital blow at the existence of every Power in Europe. Nay, not content with this, she contemplated the overthrow of our possessions in the East. By her inroads into Persia (inroads unopposed by us) she had obtained the keys of that empire, as she had recently obtained those of Turkey. The fact was, that the growing power and desire of dominion manifested ought long since to have been put a stop to; and it would have been put a stop to long ago, had England and France acted with the necessary firmness. With respect

who trusted to it. But this was not all; every attempt to extend relief to the sufferers in Poland was severely punished. It was but lately that an Ukase had been published in Russia, by which the father was prohibited from relieving the son, or the wife from assisting her husband or her child; so that this great and glorious band of freemen-men who had displayed courage in the field and wisdom in the council, were made slaves at home, or driven exiles and wanderers abroad. It was for the national honour that his Majesty's Government should take the case of these brave men into their consideration. He did not press for an answer at present to this appeal. He would only add that, as strangers and as brave men in distress, they were entitled to the hospitality of the nation, and deserved whatever assistance we could afford to bestow upon them.

Sir Edward Codrington said, that with

It

respect to the battle of Navarino, it was a | penses of such an undertaking; but the mistake to suppose that that was the cause necessary outlay of the expedition was of the distress to which Turkey had been supplied by the princely munificence of a reduced. The Emperor of Russia was merchant and citizen of London. Capmost anxious that the treaty agreed to tain Ross sailed in 1829, and was absent by the other Powers should be entered four years and a-half. He and his crew into with Turkey, and had sent an express sustained hardships unexampled in the to his fleet on the subject instead of taking annals of the British marine. He ascerthe circuitous route of London. The Rus- tained that no passage was to be found sian officers had their master's orders to as far as latitude 74. This was a most co-operate with him (Sir Edward Codring-important point to be determined. ton) on this subject, as he was in possession of all the necessary information. But, unfortunately, the change of Government at home prevented the treaty from being entered into; but if it had, then the other Powers would have compelled Russia to abide by it, and there would have been no war between Russia and Turkey. The armies of Russia, and not the fleets of that empire, had done injury by invading Constantinople. With respect to France, he could not agree with the right hon. Baronet, that France had shown a want of sincerity in her proceedings. It was a mistaken no-ther such was the case or not. Captain tion that France approved of the conduct of the French officers in the service of Mehemet Ali,

The Amendment was negatived without a division.

The House resolved into a Committee of Supply.

SUPPLY-CAPTAIN Ross.] Mr. Cutlar Fergusson rose to bring forward his motion for a grant of 5,000l. to Captain Ross, in consideration of the services rendered by him to science, and the sufferings he endured in his expedition to discover the north-west passage. He fully agreed with the hon. member for Oldham, that the public money ought not to be given away for mere asking. This he could assure the hon. Member should not be done in the case of Captain Ross, if the House should agree to this vote. No thing had contributed more to raise the character of this country for naval enterprise and skill than the efforts that had been made for the discovery of the northwest passage. The voyages of Franklin and Parry had placed the discovery more within reach than it ever had been before. Captain Ross certainly had not succeeded in the object of his expedition; but the result of his voyage was so far useful as to show clearly the direction in which a passage was not to be found. Captain Ross himself was unable to meet the ex

must be recollected, that Captain Franklin and Captain Parry had given it as their opinion that a passage was practicable in a certain direction. This Captain Ross made trial of, and ascertained that a passage was not practicable through the inlet mentioned by these navigators. This discovery alone entitled Captain Ross to recompense from the public, because Franklin and Parry having stated that a passage might be found in this direction, it would be the duty of Government to send out an expedition to determine whe

Ross saved the public the expense of this expedition. Only one man of the crew had died from the commencement to the close of his arduous undertaking, though in a climate where the thermometer was occasionally ninety-two degrees below zero. This fact alone sufficiently proved the care and attention of Captain Ross to the health and comfort of his men. The hon. Member read a letter from Sir John Franklin to the nephew of Captain Ross, not knowing the address of the Captain himself, expressing his congratulations on the safe return of the Captain, and his perseverance and ability in the prosecution of the object with which he set out. He ought to mention, that this was not the only service rendered by Captain Ross to the public, for, in 1818, he discovered in Baffin's Bay a most valuable fishery, by which this country had since then been considerably enriched, as could be attested by several hon. Members of that House. The hon. Member concluded by moving the following Resolution :-"That it is the opinion of this Committee, that a sum not exceeding 5,000l. be granted to his Majesty, in order to enable him to reward Captain Ross, of the royal navy, for the arduous and meritorious services performed by him in his 'voyage to the Arctic Sea, in the promotion of science and maritime discovery."

Mr. Hutt had formerly presented a Pe

tition on this subject, and it was one in which his constituents were deeply interested. He fully concurred in all that had been said by the hon. and learned Member as to the merits of Captain Ross. His country had drawn no less than 2,000,000l. from the fishery discovered by him on the southern coast of Baffin's Bay. Services of this kind were those that ought to be rewarded with pensions. He had as much dislike as most men to the Pension-list, but there were still some names which it gave him pleasure to see, and he would mention in particular that of Admiral Rodnev.

Sir Robert Inglis regretted, that he felt himself called upon to make any opposition to a Motion of this kind, nor should he do so were it not that it involved a principle. He was not satisfied with the part taken by the Government in this business. If Captain Ross were in truth deserving of a reward it was the duty of Government to come forward and propose it. The Motion seemed, as it now stood, to be the act of a private individual. It was true, indeed, that the noble Lord (Lord Althorp) said that the Government concurred in the proposition; but in place of giving to the Crown the grace and favour of such a proposal, the noble Lord admitted a private individual in no way connected with the naval service, to bring it forward. This, however, might be considered a mere matter of form; but it involved an important principle. A person who wore the King's uniform should not apply for reward through a private individual. He should expect his reward from the public at the recommendation of the Sovereign. During the whole time of his absence on this expedition Captain Ross was receiving halfpay as Post Captain in the navy. He must, therefore, be considered as still in the public service. A Motion of this kind should not be thrown out to be scrambled for in the House. It should have been brought forward officially by one of his Majesty's Ministers. The House had no means of knowing what were the merits of Captain Ross, or what he had done. Perhaps his right hon. friend (Sir James Graham), being at the head of the Admiralty, and having, of course, seen his papers, was the only person who could tell what he had done. Reference had been made to a voyage of Captain Ross in 1818. This voyage was

undertaken, not as a private speculator, but at the King's expense. After that voyage, undertaken in company with Captain Parry, without consulting that officer or without his consent, Captain Ross announced that he had discovered certain mountains, to which he gave the name of the Croker mountains. Now the truth was, that such mountains did not exist, for Captain Parry subsequently sailed over these very mountains, at least over that part where they were said by Captain Ross to be situated. Captain Ross's last visit was as much for the recovery of his own character as for the discovery of the North Pole. He had as yet to learn that Captain Ross had gone westwards by ten degrees, or to the north by five degrees, as far as Captain Parry; and as the latter had received no reward for his services, he could not see what especial claim the former had to a parliamentary grant. He should, therefore, meet the Motion by a direct negative.

Lord Althorp was inclined to believe that the hon. Baronet correctly explained the motives which induced Captain Ross to undertake his expedition, when he said it was for the recovery of his own reputation, and it was owing to his Majesty's Government entertaining that opinion that they had declined coming forward to propose a grant for the purpose of rewarding him. It might then be asked why in such a case they had recommended the Crown to consent to the presental of Captain Ross's petition? To such a question, supposing it to be asked, he (Lord Althorp) would reply, that, considering the feeling of the country to be in favour of rewarding Captain Ross, his Majesty's Ministers would have been acting a most ungracious part had they, by recommending the Crown not to consent to the presenting of the Petition, prevented a discussion of the subject in the House of Commons. Although, however, he thought the Government would not have been justified in recommending the grant to the House on the ground that the expedition was not undertaken by order of his Majesty's Government, he was disposed as an individual Member of that House to say that, considering the feelings of the country, they would be perfectly justified in acceding to the Motion; and such being his opinion, he was prepared, in the result of a division, to give it his support.

Sir Edward Codrington said, he would give his cordial support to the Motion. Mr. O'Connell thought, that the grant proposed was an exceedingly stingy one, and ought to have been much greater.

Mr. Aaron Chapman was of opinion that in a commercial point of view Captain Ross's services were well worth the grant proposed. He regretted it was so small in amount.

Mr. George Frederick Young thought, that the second person in command of the expedition was quite as much entitled to reward as Captain Ross, and with a view of enabling his Majesty to bestow on him such reward, he begged to move as an Amendment that, instead of 5,000l., a sum of 7,500l. be granted, on the understanding that the difference should be paid to Commander Ross.

Sir Robert Peel wished the House clearly to ascertain the real grounds on which they were about, as he now believed they were, to bestow a grant upon Captain Ross. Was it in consideration of his services, or out of respect for his character and admiration of that chivalrous spirit he was alleged to have manifested? If in consideration of his services, he thought they should have been previously laid in detail before the House, so that they might know exactly what they were. On the other hand, if the vote was to be agreed to out of respect for the character of Captain Ross, and admiration of his chivalry, he feared there would be many equally strong claims for similar grants. He thought that the seamen and others who had shared the dangers of the expedition with Captain Ross ought to have shared the reward, and in order to have clearly ascertained what those actual services were, he regretted much the hon. and learned Member had not moved for a Committee of Inquiry instead of at once proposing a grant of money. This would have relieved them from the dangerous precedent which he feared they were about establishing by adopting the course proposed by the hon. and learned Member.

allotted double pay for the whole time they were employed; while every officer, with the single exception of Captain Ross, had received promotion in some shape or other. That the services of Captain Ross did not deserve to pass unrewarded, every one he thought, must admit; and as the Admiralty had no power to bestow such reward, he trusted the House would accede to the Motion.

Mr. Aglionby thought it would be far preferable to refer the matter to a Select Committee. The House would then see for what services they were voting, and would regulate the amount of their vote accordingly.

Sir Henry Hardinge agreed with the hon. and, learned Member, and, as an officer, considered that Captain Ross would be more honoured by having his case brought before a Committee than he would be by any vote or grant they might come to in his favour at that hour, (two o'clock in the morning). As to the men that served under the gallant Captain, they had only had their bare bargain; and he would say in the name of the sailors in his Majesty's service, that these seamen were as well entitled to be rewarded as Captain Ross himself. He thought that his hon. and learned friend who moved the Resolution, would do more justice to Captain Ross, and his officers and crew, by altering his Motion for a grant of 5,000l. to one referring the matter to a Select Committee. He felt certain, that no Gentleman who might be on that Committee would alter the grant to a less sum than 5,000%.

Lord Sandon begged the hon. and learned Gentleman to submit the case to a Select Committee, since in that way he would best consult the feelings of the gallant Captain.

Mr. Cutlar Fergusson said, that he should be extremely unwilling to resist the inclinations of the House. He was most anxious that the services of Captain Ross should be better understood by the House, though he thought that he had already fully explained to them the great

to geographical science in solving one great question that had hitherto been undecided. Under the present circumstances he had no objection to withdraw his Motion in favour of a Committee, and he should, therefore, when the Speaker resumed the Chair, give notice of a Motion

Sir James Graham said, that as an in-services the gallant Captain had rendered dividual Member of the House he would support the vote, and he would do so on the ground that every individual composing the expedition, with the single exception of Captain Ross, had already been rewarded for their services by the Admiralty. To the seamen the Admiralty had VOL. XXII. {Third}

N

« PreviousContinue »