The Philosophical Defence of PsychiatryBy first analysing the arguments of psychiatry's critics and the philosophical ideas of such thinkers as Freud, Eysenck, Laing, Szasz, Sedgwick and Foucault and by then providing answers to the many contentious and diverse questions raised, Dr. Reznek aims to establish a philosophical defence of the theory and practice of psychiatry. As both a qualified philosopher and psychiatrist, the author is exceptionally p[laced to undertake the examination of a subject which has hitherto remained untackled. It will be easily accessible to a wide variety of non-specialists as well. It will be of specific interest to those involved in the practice of philosophy, psychiatry, clinical psychology, social work and psychiatric nursing. |
Contents
PSYCHIATRY IN CRISIS | 1 |
1 THE MEDICAL PARADIGM | 13 |
2 SIGMUND FREUD AND THE PATHOLOGIZING OF NORMALITY | 27 |
3 HANS EYSENCK AND THE NORMALIZING OF NEUROSIS | 41 |
4 RONALD LAING AND THE RATIONALIZING OF MADNESS | 55 |
5 THOMAS SZASZ AND THE PHYSICALIZING OF DISEASE | 73 |
6 PETER SEDGWICK AND THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF ILLNESS | 97 |
7 THOMAS SCHEFF AND THE LABELLING OF DEVIANCE | 105 |
9 PARADIGMS OF MENTAL ILLNESS | 131 |
10 THE NATURE OF MENTAL ILLNESS | 157 |
11 IS PSYCHIATRY A SCIENCE? | 179 |
12 PSYCHIATRY AND RESPONSIBILITY | 193 |
13 THE PRACTICE OF PSYCHIATRY | 211 |
THE NATURE OF PSYCHIATRY | 229 |
235 | |
247 | |
8 MICHEL FOUCAULT AND THE CIVILIZING OF MADNESS | 121 |
Common terms and phrases
abnormal behaviour actions agent agoraphobia alcoholism anorexia nervosa argue argument fails assumes autonomy become behavioural paradigm brain causal thesis classified cognitive conceptual premise conclude conditioned reflexes conflict consequences continuum fallacy cultural norms defined delusions depression desires and beliefs deviation discover disease process disease status disease theory disorder distinct disturbed essentialist fallacy evidence example excuse explain Eysenck fact factual premise Foucault Freud function hence homosexuality hypotheses identical identify individual intentional paradigm involuntary irrational judge judgements justified labelling theory learned helplessness learning locus coeruleus mean medical paradigm melancholia mental illness neurosis neurotic symptoms normal observation one’s person phobia physical political dissidence premise is false problem psychiatry psychodynamic paradigm psychological psychotic rational reasons responsible Reznek Scheff schizophrenia schizophrenic behaviour scientific sick role Similarly simply social role society sociological paradigm someone sort stereotype suffering Suppose Szasz therapy treat treatment true underlying nature underlying process undermine undesirable voluntary