The Philosophical Defence of Psychiatry

Front Cover
Routledge, Jul 8, 2005 - Education - 264 pages
By first analysing the arguments of psychiatry's critics and the philosophical ideas of such thinkers as Freud, Eysenck, Laing, Szasz, Sedgwick and Foucault and by then providing answers to the many contentious and diverse questions raised, Dr. Reznek aims to establish a philosophical defence of the theory and practice of psychiatry.
As both a qualified philosopher and psychiatrist, the author is exceptionally p[laced to undertake the examination of a subject which has hitherto remained untackled. It will be easily accessible to a wide variety of non-specialists as well. It will be of specific interest to those involved in the practice of philosophy, psychiatry, clinical psychology, social work and psychiatric nursing.
 

Contents

PSYCHIATRY IN CRISIS
1
1 THE MEDICAL PARADIGM
13
2 SIGMUND FREUD AND THE PATHOLOGIZING OF NORMALITY
27
3 HANS EYSENCK AND THE NORMALIZING OF NEUROSIS
41
4 RONALD LAING AND THE RATIONALIZING OF MADNESS
55
5 THOMAS SZASZ AND THE PHYSICALIZING OF DISEASE
73
6 PETER SEDGWICK AND THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF ILLNESS
97
7 THOMAS SCHEFF AND THE LABELLING OF DEVIANCE
105
9 PARADIGMS OF MENTAL ILLNESS
131
10 THE NATURE OF MENTAL ILLNESS
157
11 IS PSYCHIATRY A SCIENCE?
179
12 PSYCHIATRY AND RESPONSIBILITY
193
13 THE PRACTICE OF PSYCHIATRY
211
THE NATURE OF PSYCHIATRY
229
REFERENCES
235
INDEX
247

8 MICHEL FOUCAULT AND THE CIVILIZING OF MADNESS
121

Common terms and phrases

Bibliographic information