Page images
PDF
EPUB

ARRANGED, ANNOTATED, AND EDITED

BY

ROBERT CAMPBELL, M.A.,

OF LINCOLN'S INN, BARRISTER-AT-LAW, ADVOCATE OF THE SCOTCH BAR,

AND LATE FELLOW OF TRINITY HALL, CAMBRIDGE.

ASSISTED BY OTHER MEMBERS OF THE BAR.

WITH AMERICAN NOTES

BY

IRVING BROWNE,

FORMERLY EDITOR OF THE AMERICAN REPORTS AND

THE ALBANY LAW JOURNAL.

VOL. XIV.

INSURANCE -- INTERPRETATION.

LONDON:
STEVENS AND SONS, LIMITED.
BOSTON, U.S.A.: THE BOSTON BOOK CO.
Law Publishers and Booksellers.

1898.

The use made in this work of the Law Reports published by
the Council of Law Reporting is by the permission of the
Council kindly given for this purpose.

326974

Copyright, 1898,
BY STEVENS AND Sons, LIMITED.

SET, PLATED, AND PRINTED
By John WILSON AND Son, CAMBRIDGE, U.S.A.,

AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS.

.....:

INSURANCE (continued).

SECTION VI. — CONSTRUCTION (continued).

(5)—SUING AND LABOURING CLAUSES.

PAGE

No. 73. Kidston v. Empire Marine Insurance Co...... 247

SECTION VII. – DEVIATION AND CHANGE OF Voyage.

See “ Deviation," 9 R. C. 351-419.

SECTION VIII. — Loss. Causa proxima spectatur.

No. 74. Ionides v. Universal Marine Association . . . . .

No. 75. Lawrence v. Aberdein . . . . . . . . . . 296

No. 76. De Vaux v. Salvador . . . . . . . . . . . 304

No. 77. Bell v. Carstairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319

No. 78. Busk v. Royal Exchange Assurance Co... 332

No. 79. Earle v. Rowcroft . . . . . . . . . . . . 345

No. 80. Koster v. Reed . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358

SECTION IX. — ABANDONMENT AND TOTAL Loss.

See - Abandonment," 1 R. C. 1-155.

Section X. — GENERAL AVERAGE Loss.

No. 81. Taylor v. Curtis

No. 82. The Bona (English and American Ship-building 363

Co. v. Indemnity Mutual Marine Insurance Co.) )

No. 83. Atwood v. Sellar . . . . . . . . . . . . . 386

No. 84. Gould v. Oliver . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400

No. 85. Anderson v. Ocean Steamship Co. . . . . . . . 409

No. 86. Simonds v. White . . . . . . . . . . . . 422

No. 87. Dickenson v. Jardine . . . . . . . . . . . 431

SECTION XI. — ADJUSTMENT OF Losses.

No. 88. Usher v. Noble . . . . . . . . . . . . . 438

No. 89. Aitchison v. Lohre. Appeal from Lohre v. Aitchison /

448

No. 90. Pitman v. Universal Marine Insurance Co.

No. 91. Palmer v. Blackburn · ·

· ·

486

No. 92. Bruce v. Jones . . . . . . . . . . . . . 489

No. 93. Newby v. Reed .............

497

Section XII. — RETURN OF PREMIUM.

No. 94. Syrie v. Fletcher )

No. 95. Bermon v. Woodbridge . . . . . . . . . 501

No. 96. Long v. Allan

No. 97. Bradford v. Symondson · · · · · · · · · ·

No. 98. Feise v. Parkinson ............ 530

No. 99. Lowry v. Bourdieu ?

No. 100. Vandyck v. Hewitt S · · · · · · · · · · · 533

INTEREST. · · · · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 540-577

(See also No. 20 of “ Administration,” and notes, 2 R.

C. 172 et seq., and Nos. 1 and 2 of “Infant," and notes,

13 R. C. 1 et seq.)

No. 1. Calton v. Bragg /

No. 2. Cook v. Fowlers. · · · · · · . . . . . 540

No. 3. Burdick v. Garrick . . . . . . . . . . . . 565
724

« PreviousContinue »