Page images
PDF
EPUB

she was to select her husband, uses nearly

the same expression

The honour, sir, which flames in your fair eyes,
Before I speak too threat'ningly replies."▪

The Mask of Comus was acted before the earl of Bridgewater, the president of Wales, in 1634, at Ludlow Castle; and the characters of the Lady and the two Brothers were

■ The readers of Milton's juvenile poetry are under considerable obligations to Mr. Warton; but this gentleman, like other commentators, sometimes employs much perverse ingenuity in making what is plain obscure, what is good bad. Accumulating passages, in a note on verse 81 of this piece

And so attend ye on her glittering state,

to prove that the word "state" was used by our old poets to express that particular part of the royal apparatus, a canopy, (in not one of which passages, by the bye, may "state" be considered as possessing any meaning different from what would be assigned to it by a modern poet,) he tells us that in this sense, (the sense of canopy,) is state," to be understood in the description of the swan in the 7th book of Paradise Lost:

The swan with arched neck

Between her white wings mantling, proudly rows
Her state with oary feet.-

i. c., the swan with arched neck, between the mantling of her white wings, proudly rows her canopy, (her head and bent neck) with her feet for oars. Having established this sense of the pas sage, he very properly accuses the great poet of an affected and unnatural conceit!!! If this be not ingenuity become mad, chievous, and dull-I will appeal, from the black letter critics, to all the readers of taste,

From old Bellerium to the northern main,

from the Land's End to John-a-Grot's house.

mis

represented by the lady Alice Egerton, then about thirteen years of age, and her two brothers, lord Brackley and Thomas Egerton, who were still younger. The story of this piece is said to have been suggested by the circumstance of the lady Alice having been separated from her company in the night, and having wandered for some time by herself in the forest of Haywood,' as she was returning from a distant visit to meet her father, on his taking possession of his newly intrusted scepter. On this small base of fact a most sumptuous and beautiful edifice of fancy has been constructed.

Comus, KOMOΣ, or revelry, had been

• See Warton's note on Comus, said to be mentioned in a MS. by Oldys, 1.34.

• Τὴν γαρ στέγην τήνδ' ἔποτ' ἐκλέιπει χορὸς
Σύμφλογίος, ἐκ εύφωνος· Β' γαρ εὖ λίγει.
Καὶ μὴν πεπωκώς γ', ώς θρασύνεσθαι πλέον,
Βρότειον αἷμα κώμος ἐν δόμοις μενει,
Δύσπεμπτος έξω Συγόνων ἐριννύων.
Υμνεσι δ ̓ ὕμνον δώμασι προσήμεναι
Πρώταρχον στην

The band of Furies, with their voices tuned
In dreadful harmony, shall never quit

These fatal walls: and now with human blood
Drunk and made savage, Coмus riots here,
Sent by his kindred Furies to destroy :
While they, the baleful inmates of this house
With notes of horror and Tartarean din,
Sing the first crime of this devoted race.

personified, as Mr. Warton has remarked before me, in a dreadfully sublime passage of the Agamemnon of Eschylus; and the jolly god had been already introduced upon our stage in a mask by Ben Jonson: but it remained for Milton to develope his form and character, to give him a lineage and an empire, and to make him the hero of the most exquisite dramatic poem, which, perhaps, the genius of man has ever produced. Among the compositions of our own country it certainly stands unrivalled for its affluence in poetic imagery and diction; and, as an effort of the creative power, it can be paralleled only by the muse of Shakspeare, by whom, in this respect, it is possibly exceeded.

With Shakspeare the whole, with excep tion to some rude outlines or suggestions of the story, is the immediate emanation of his own mind: but Milton's erudition prohibited him from this extreme originality, and was perpetually supplying him with thoughts, which would sometimes obtain the preference from his judgment, and would sometimes be mistaken for her own property by his invention. Original, however, he is; and of all the sons of song inferior in this requisite of genius only to Shakspeare. Neither of these wonderful men was so far privileged above

his species as to possess other means of acquiring knowledge than through the inlets of the senses, and the subsequent operations of the mind on this first mass of ideas. The most exalted of human intelligences cannot form one mental phantasm uncompounded of this visible world. Neither Shakspeare nor Milton could conceive a sixth corporeal sense, or a creature absolutely distinct from the inhabiters of this world. A Caliban or an Ariel; a devil, or an angel are only several compositions and modifications of our animal creation; and heaven and hell can be built with nothing more than our terrestrial elements newly arranged and variously combined. The distinction, therefore, between one human intelligence and another must be occasioned solely by the different degrees of clearness, force, and quickness with which it perceives, retains and combines. On the superiority in these mental faculties it would be difficult to decide between those extraordinary men, who are the immediate subjects of our remark: for if we are astonished at that power, which, from a single spot, as it were, could collect sufficient materials for the construction of a world of its own, we cannot gaze without wonder

at that proud magnificence of intellect, which rushing, like some mighty river through extended lakes, and receiving into its bosom the contributory waters of a thousand regions, preserves its course, its name, and its character entire. With Milton, from whatever mine the ore may originally be derived, the coin issues from his own mint with his own image and superscription; and passes into currency with a value peculiar to itself. To speak accurately, the mind of Shakspeare could not create; and that of Milton invented with equal or with nearly equal power and effect. If we admit in the Tempest, or the Midsummer's Night's Dream, a higher flight of the inventive faculty, we must allow a less interrupted stretch of it in the Comus. In this In this poem there may be something, which might have been corrected by the revising judgment of its author; but its errors, in thought and in language, are so few and trivial that they must be regarded as the inequality of the plumage, and not as the depression or the unsteadiness of the wing. The most splendid results of Shakspeare's poctry are still urged and separated by some interposing defect: but the poetry of the Comus may be contemplated as a series of

« PreviousContinue »