![[ocr errors]](https://books.google.co.uk/books/content?id=SgRXAAAAcAAJ&output=html_text&pg=PA155&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&q=editions:OCLC12407328&cds=1&sig=ACfU3U2LRoKf9hDvo5YMsp7uqELf_vHGvg&edge=0&edge=stretch&ci=684,30,18,44)
![[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]](https://books.google.co.uk/books/content?id=SgRXAAAAcAAJ&output=html_text&pg=PA155&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&q=editions:OCLC12407328&cds=1&sig=ACfU3U2LRoKf9hDvo5YMsp7uqELf_vHGvg&edge=0&edge=stretch&ci=-9,235,57,742)
the legislature should out-balance another. Thus do we observe, from experience, that whatever be their derangement in a tem- porary convulsion of the state, they are sure to return, with peace and order, to their an- cient level. And as in nature, the serene sun- shine, which immediately succeeds a storm, adds peculiar lustre to the objects, which it irradiates, so most disturbances in our state have terminated in adding light and vigo our constitutional rights and liberties. This is the halcyon view of our political constitu- tion, which Dr. Kippis represents immedi- ately after the revolution of 1688: * " To
Pleasing view be favoured with a form of government, of of our conttu- which liberty is the basis, is the greatest of Kippis. all temporal blessings; and the nations, on which so nobļe a gift has been bestowed, ap- pear with peculiar glory in the history of the world. It has been the happiness of Britain to poffefs this benefit in a high degree of perfection. The system of our government is not singly a democracy, an aristocracy, or a monarchy; but an excellent composition of the three. It adopts the advantages of these several schemes, and rejects their incon- veniencies; it assumes the equality of a de-
![[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]](https://books.google.co.uk/books/content?id=SgRXAAAAcAAJ&output=html_text&pg=PA155&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&q=editions:OCLC12407328&cds=1&sig=ACfU3U2LRoKf9hDvo5YMsp7uqELf_vHGvg&edge=0&edge=stretch&ci=-15,923,55,637)
* Dr. Kippis's Sermon preached at the Old Jewry on che 4th of Nov. 1788, p. 24, 25,
mocracy,
![[ocr errors]](https://books.google.co.uk/books/content?id=SgRXAAAAcAAJ&output=html_text&pg=PA156&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&q=editions:OCLC12407328&cds=1&sig=ACfU3U02rliYXSZcSy63Sx_Vqi86WAfHBw&edge=0&edge=stretch&ci=987,674,14,11)
mocracy, without its confusion; the wisdom and moderation of an aristocracy, in some respects, without its severity in others; and the vigour of a monarchy without its ty. ranny; and it admirably provides for the dif. tinct exercise of the judicial authority. Hence, it presents a plan of power, which produces more true freedom, than perhaps has yet been enjoyed by any community, in any pe. riod."
The rights, which attended this donation or investiture of power, I shall endeavour more particularly to illustrate, when I se- parately consider each branch of the legif- lature. I shall first, however, beg leave to premise some leading observations, con. cerning the revolution and its principles and effects. As a member of the contented ma- jority of this community or nation, I must from henceforth view and consider the su, preme legislative power completelyvested in our parliament ; and in them am I to seek
the unalienable rights of the people, whom The right of they completely represent; for in them the the legislature to alter the go. sovereignty of power to alter, change, amend,
and improve the constitution and govern. ment of the community indefeasibly resides. Whatever mental objections I may conceive against the truth of this proposition, as a
member
member of the community I am bounden, un der the penalties of high treason (and the community have a right to bind me) to keep my opinion to myself: * “ if any person High treason to shall, by writing or printing, maintain and affirm, that the kings or queens of this realm, with and by the authority of parliament, are not able to make laws and statutes of fufli. cient validity to limit the crown, and the descent, inheritance, and government thereof, every such person shall be guilty of high treason.” This act is as coercive upon me at this moment, as it was binding upon all my predeceffors, who were living at the time of its passing into a law. The act neither gives nor declares any new rights, but em- phatically imports such a reverential and at. ful conviction, that the supreme or fovereign right and power of forming and changing our government, ever did and ever must reside in the people, that makes it treasonable (not to think) but to express a thought to the con- trary.
OF THE REVOLUTION, AND OF ITS PRINCIPLES
HE avowal of the principles, which
I have already endeavoured to establifh, induces the mortifying necessity of arguing upon the revolution, in a manner different from that great personage, whose talents and virtues are the ornament and glory of the present age :
* “ They threw a politic well wrought veil over every circumstance tending to weaken the rights, which, in the meliorated order of succession, they meant to perpetuate, or which might furnish a precedent for
any future departure from what they had then settled for ever.” No won. der that the malcontents of the present day, when not permitted to attribute effects to their real causes, should fly into any extra.
vagancy, which can be proposed to them. Mischief of de- Unlimited is the mischief of not avowing, or
of denying or dissembling true principles. I prizaciples. neither see the policy, nor admit of the ne
#ying or dirsembling true
* Mr. Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France, p. 25.
cessity
![[ocr errors]](https://books.google.co.uk/books/content?id=SgRXAAAAcAAJ&output=html_text&pg=PA159&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&q=editions:OCLC12407328&cds=1&sig=ACfU3U0HHNkCkSWgz3zsxz6qndowl-UfQw&edge=0&edge=stretch&ci=-5,701,18,32)
cessity of putting extreme cases to elucidate the truth of our constitutional doctrine ; but, though I make the largest allowances for the indelicacy, the indiscretion, the impru- dence, the insolence, or the malice of this practice, still do I see less evil in the con- fequences, than in one attempt to deny or difsemble the truth of the first principles of civil government.
Since this nation or community has de- Ads of parliaposed its sovereign power with parliamentary ads of the peo
ple of England. deputies or representatives, there can be no act of parliament, which is not the act of the people of England ; nor can there be an act of the people of England, which is not an act of the parliament of England; whatever, therefore, may be said of the one, may also with strictnefs be faid of the other. If therefore this fense and meaning be properly attended to, little offence, or even displeasure, can be taken at most of the propo. sitions, that have been lately hazarded by the different leaders and fomenters of the discontented minority. Thus, if we come truly and impartially to consider the three rights, which Dr. Price reminded his audience, at the Old Jewry, were gained by the revolution, we shall find nothing false in his
politicotheologic affertion, but that we gained
them
« PreviousContinue » |