and manifested to be weak and sophistical—The consistency of exhortations and
promises farther cleared-The manner of the operation of grace in and upon the
wills of men considered - The inconsistency of exhortations with the efficacy of grace
disputed by Mr G.–That discourse removed, and the use of exhortations farther
cleared-Obedience to them twofold, habitual, actual-Of the physical operation of
grace and means of the word–Their compliance and use-How the one and the
other affect the will-Inclination to persevere, when wrought in believers-Of the
manner of God's operation on the wills of men-Mr G.'s discourse and judgment
considered-Effects follow, as to their kind, their next causes—The same act of the
will physical and moral upon several accounts—Those accounts considered-God,
by the real efficacy of the Spirit, produceth in us acts of the will morally good
That confirmed from Scripture-Conclusion from thence-Of the terms “physical,”
"moral," and “necessary,” and their use in things of the nature under considera-
tion-Moral causes of physical effects - The concurrence of physical and moral causes
for producing the same effect-The efficacy of grace and exhortations—“Physical"
and necessary," how distinguished—“Moral” and “not necessary" confounded by
Mr G.-Mr G.'s farther progress considered—What operation of God on the will of
man he allows-All physical operation by him excluded-Mr G.'s sense of the dif-
ference between the working of God and a minister on the will, that it is but gra-
dual; considered and removed-All working of God on the will by him confined to
persuasion-Persuasion gives no strength or ability to the person persuaded-AU
immediate actings of God to good in men by Mr G. utterly excluded-Wherein
God's persuading men doth consist, according to Mr G.-1 Cor. iii. 9 considered-Of
the concurrence of divers agents to the production of the same effect—The sum of
the seventh section of chap. xiii.- The will, how necessitated, how free-In what
sense Mr G. allows God's persuasions to be irresistible–The dealings of God and
men ill compared-Paul's exhortation to the use of means, when the end was cer.
tain, Acts xxvii. 21--36, considered-God deals with men as men, exhorting them;
and as corrupted men, assisting them-Of promises of temporal things, whether ali
conditional-What condition in the promise made to Paul, Acts xxvii. 24–Farther
of that promise; its infallibility and means of accomplishment-The same considera-
tions farther prosecuted-Of promises of perseverance and exhortations to perform
in conjunction - Mr G.'s opposition hereunto-Promises and exhortations in con.
junction - 1 Cor. x. 12, 13 discussed-An absolute promise of perseverance therein
evinced-Phil
. ii. 12, 13, to the same purpose, considered - Mr G.'s interpretation of
that place proposed, removed-Heb. vi. 4-6, 9, to the same purpose insisted on-Of the
consistency of threatenings with the promises of perseverance, Mr G.'s opposition
hereunto considered and removed-What promises of perseverance are asserted; how
absolute and unfrustrable-Fear of hell and punishment twofold--The fear intended
to be ingenerated by threatenings not inconsistent with the assurance given by
promises - Five considerations about the use of threatenings—The first, etc.-Hypo-
crites, how threatened for apostasy-Of the end and aim of God in threatenings-Of
the proper end and efficacy of threatenings with reference unto true believers-Fear
of hell and punishment, how far a principle of obedience in the saints-Of Noah's
fear, Heb. xi. 7-Mr G.'s farther arguings for the efficacy of the fear of hell unto
obedience in the saints proposed, considered, removed-1 John iv. 18 considered-
Of the obedience of saints to their heavenly Father, compared to the obedience of
children to their natural parents-Mr G.'s monstrous conception about this thing-
How fear and love are principles of obedience, and in what sense- - That which is
done from fear not done willingly nor cheerfully-How fear, and what fear, hath
torment-Of the nature and use of promises—Close of the answer to this argu.
ment,
425