« PreviousContinue »
MAINTENANCE - Champerty - Bankrupt's
right of action-Assignment by trustee in
bankruptcy-Bankruptcy Act, 1883, s. 57,
147. 5. --“Street "-Local authority-Power
See MORTGAGE. 10.
c. 82). In re A. B. BRICE (A SUPPOSED INSANE moval of cause-Lord Mayor's Court-Prac-
PERSON) - - - . C. A. 40 tice-Mayor's Court of London Procedure Act
7. - Person of unsound mind-Autho- (20 & 21 Vict. c. clvii.), s. 17. Priu v. SMITH
LIVERPOOL CAUSES_Place of trial - 4 | KENT AND SURREY PERMANENT BUILDING 2. Jurisdiction-Prohibition --Account
SOCIETY - - - North, J., 90 stated--Mayor's Court of London. In re A
A 243 Act (20 & 21 Vict. c. clvii.), s. 12-Judicature
Act, 1873, s. 25, sub-s. 6. READ v. BROWN
- Pauper lunatic - - -
4. — Jurisdiction-Probibition-Mayor's
METROPOLIS MANAGEMENT ACTS-contd. , MORTGAGE-continued.
Remaindernen - Mitropolis Local Japage. Wills o. Luff - - Chitty, J., 69 - Statute of Limitations - - 103
- Sub-lease by way of-Disclaimer
sessions-Appeal-Valuation (Metropolis) Act, 10. — Gift-Equitable assignment-Re- -
Trustee Act - - - 11, 217
NEXT FRIEND-Costs - - - PARLIAMENT-continued.
NEXT OF KIN_Construction of will - 179 tion Act, 1885 (48 Vict. c. 15), s. 18–County
BUCHAN V. ARTLETT - - North, J., 76
See PRACTICE-PLEADING. 1, 2, 9.
1 9. — Revocation of patent, petition for-
action - Sale - Absent parties - Service of signs and Trade Marke Ar
signs, and Trade Marks Acts, 1883, ss. 19, 26,
xxx., r. 1; Order xxxvi., r. 1. In re EDMONDS'
Scientific witnesses-Patent case.
friend-Practice - Partition actions -- Parti-
- Discontinuance of action - - 222
- Representation of the People Act, 1867 (30
See PRACTICE-PROCEDURE. 25.
243 PAVING EXPENSES-Street - 87. 92. 233
- Tenant for lite - - - 36
See METROPOLIS MANAGEMENT Acts.
Old lodger's list-Claim to be registered-
2. — Practice -- Partnership action -
Reasonable suspicion that article offered in
pawn was stolen-Pawnbrokers' Act, 1872
3. —- Borough vote-Lodger franchise in integrum -- Indemnity. ADAMS AND
See COMPANY-WINDING-UP. 16.
- Of dividends out of capital
See COMPANY. 5.
- Out of capital - - - 6
[C. A. 136
PAYMENT INTO COURT - Particulars — PLEDGE-continued.
POWER—General power of appointment by
will-Exercise-Wills Act, 1837, s. 27. In re
MARSH. Mason v. THORNE North, J., 111
--Denial of liability-Continuance of action | HILTON v. TUCKER - Kekewich, J., 148 pointment – Power of revocation - Will
Effect of general bequest-Wills Act (1 Vict.
of Chancery (Funds) Act, 1872 (35 & 36 Vict. POOR LAW – Guardians – Employment of
See SETTLEMENT. 4, 5.
Of appointment Intestacy - -
unnecessary-Practice. VERNON v. CROFT c. 101, ss. 32, 35, 39—Solicitors Act (6 & 7 Vict.
Of appointment—Revocation - 83
- Joint, by persons not joint traders 113
rate_County rate-Lands Clauses Consolida- | Habeas Corpus-Judicature Act, 1873 (36 & 37
2. - Procedure - Distress warrant. order-Writ of sequestration-Order LVIII.,
OVERSEERS OF MANCHESTER v. HEADLAM AND r. 4. SPENCER v. ANCOATS VALE RUBBER
OF ACTON, REsPS. - - - H. L., 192 of action-Order LXV., r. 27, sub-r. 9. WIND-
- Distress-Priority - - - 188 NAM v. BAINTON - - Q. B. Div. 141
See COMPANY-WINDING-UP. 14. 4. - Costs of motion for injunction
GESELLSCHAFT v. PICKFORD & Co.
- Satisfaction - - - - 70 5. - Counter-claim - Counter - claim
V. PRACTICE-PLEADING-continued. VI. PRACTICE-PROCEDURE-continued. jurs-Discretion of judge-County Courts 6. — Pleading matter since writ-Rules 11. — Discovery - Affidavit of docuAct, 1867, s. 5-Judicature Act, 1873, s. 24, / of Supreme Court, 1883, Order xxiv., r. 3— ments-Privilege-Shorthand writer's notes. sub-8 13-Rules of Supreme Court, 1883, | Confession of defences-Judgment for costs. | In re WORSWICK. Robson v. WORSWICK Order xxi., rr. 11-14; Order Lxv., r. 1. LEWIN BRIDGETOWN WATERWORKS COMPANY •, BAR
(North, J., 90 t. TRIMMING. TRIMIŅG v. LEWIN & CHAD BADOS WATER SUPPLY COMPANY North, J., 96 12. - Discovery - Further interrogaWICK & Sons, by counter-claim Q. B. Div. 160 7. Recovery of land, claim for, joined tories-A general roving interrogatory as to 6. — Fees — Percentage — Order as to
without leave-Administration action--Time documents disallowed. EDISON AND SWAN Supreme Court Fees, 1884–Schedule, fee 72
for taking objection-Rules of Supreme Court, UNITED ELECTRIC Light COMPANY v. HOLLAND -Periodical accounts-Fee quantum meruit.
1883, Order Lxx., r. 2. In re DERBON. DERBON AND JABLOCHKOFF GENERAL ELECTRICITY In re CRAWSHAY. DENNIS v. CRAWSHAY
v. COLLIS - - Kekewich, J., 104 COMPANY - - - - C. A. 31 [North, J., 167 8. — Striking out-Embarrassing matter
13. - Discovery-Patents, Designs, and 7.- Joint defendants - Severance of
--Separate causes of action-Statement of Trade Marks Act, 1883 (46 & 47 Vicit c. 57). defence-Verdict for plaintiff-Costs of issues claim-Seeking relief not asked by writ-Dis- 18. 32_Action to restrain
s. 32–Action to restrain tbrcats-Particulars oa pleas of one defendant allowed against him
continuance-Rules of Supreme Court, 1883, of defendunt's patents. UNION ELECTRICAL only. STOMM v. Dixon & KNIGHT
Order XVIII., r. 1.; Order XIX., r. 27 ; Order | POWER AND Light COMPANY V. ELECTRICAL [Q. B. Div. 218 XXVI., r. 1- Patent action. UNITED TELE
POWER STORAGE COMPANY - - C. A. 88 8. — Judgment on admissions in plead
PHONE COMPANY v. TASKER - Kay, J., 222
9. — ings- Motion or summons in Chambers-Costs
15. Third party notice — Rules of
Discovery - Privilege — Solicitor
and client-Materials obtained by party to -Rules of Supreme Court, 1883, Order xxxII., Supreme Court, 1883, Order xvi., rr. 48, 52.
action otherwise than at the instance of his r. 6; Order xi., r. 1. LONDON STEAM DYEING BARTON v. LONDON AND NORTH - WESTERN
solicitor—Privilege as regards party conductCOMPANY v. DIGBY - - North, J., 35 RAILWAY COMPANY - - - C. A. 72
ing cause in person. Kyshe v. Holt, CHILDS, 9. — Motion standing over until trialVI. PRACTICE, PROCEDURE-Affidavits
AND BROTHERTON - - Q. B. Div. 128 Practice of the Court - Chitty, J., 205
Adjournment from Chambers into Court-
16. - Discovery - Production of docu10. — Refresher fees to counsel- Appeal
Time for filing affidavits fixed by chief clerk. ments-Privilege-Affairs of state. HENfrom Chancery Division-Taxation of costs
In re CHIFFERIEL. CHIFFERIEL v. WATSON NESSEY v. WRIGHT - - Q. B. Div. 142 Rules of Supreme Court, 1883, Order Lxv.,
[North, J., 155 17. - Execution - Appointment of re1. 27, sub-rr. 30, 37, 38, 48. EASTON r. LONDON JOINT STOCK BANK
2. — Attachment – Application for, ceiver-Equitable execution -Judicature Act, - - - C. A. 8
should be brought on in open Court by motion. / 1873, s. 25, sub.s. 8. MANCHESTER AND 11. — Taxation where plaintiff' succeeds
-Order XLIV., r. 2. In re Davis. DAVIS v. | LIVERPOOL DISTRICT BANKING COMPANY v. on claim and defendant on counter-claim -
GALMOYE - - - - C. A. 193 | PARKINSON - - - - C. A. 243 Taxation -General costs of action- Claim
3. — Attachments — Service-Rules of and counter-claim
| 18. — Hearing counsel-Case depend– Entry of judgment Order xxi., s. 17. SHRAPNEL v. LAING AND
Supreme Court, 1883, Order xliv., r. 2. In re / ing entirely on the facts-Questions of law.
LUXMŰRE. GORDON v. WOODS North, J., 63 | KAY v. CAMMELL - Kekewich, J., 250 OTHERS - - - - C. A. 7 12. —- Transfer of fund in Court-Petition
4. Chambers, order in — Motion to | 19. - Injunction on motion by plaintiff, or summons — Sumnions issued in error —
discharge-Evidence-Affidavits filed since lex parte. granted, and undertaking as to Petition subsequently presented — Costs of order-- Leave to use — Review - Judicature
damages given-Motion on the hearing, after summons - Rules of Supreme Court, 1883, |
Act, 1873, s. 50. In re ROUSE. Rouse v. adjournments, dismissed-Motion by defenOrder Lv., r. 2. In re JELLARD's Trusts TRIBLE - - - - Kay, J., 231
dant for inquiry as to damages, allowed. Ross (North, J., 42
5. — Change of parties–Baukruptcy v. BUXTON - - - Stirling, J., 55
Discovery–Rules of Supreme Court, 1883, 13. — Transfer out of Court-Petition
20. Interrogatories — Action for libel or summons-Costs-Rules of Supreme Court, Order xvII., r. 4. GOSLINGS v. TRITTON
against publisher of newspaper—Publication 1883, Order Lv., r. 2 (1). Bates v. MOORE
[North, J., 213
| admitted by defendant-Disclosure of name of [North, J., 73
6. Charging order — Jurisdiction - I writer of alleged libel—Disclosure of original III. PRACTICE-DIVORCE.
| Cash standing to credit of judgment debtor in manuscript. HENNESSEY r. WRIGUT
[C. A. 163 See Cases under DIVORCE.
1 & 2 Vict. c. 110, ss. 12, 14–3 & 4 Vict. IV. PRACTICE EVIDENCE-Cross-examina-c. 82, s. 1-Judicature Act, 1873, s. 24, sub- |
21. — Originating summons — Actiontion before examiner-Transmission of deposi- | s. 7-Rules of Supreme Court, 1883, Order of Rules of Supreme Court, 1883, Order lv.,
| costs—Settlement--New trustees, appointment tions-Rules of Su; reme Court, 1883, Order XLVI., rr. 1, 3–Supreme Court Funds Rules, IXXVII, r. 16. MAPLE 0. STEVENSON
r. 3 (g). ELWORTHY v. HARVEY 1886, r. 99. BRERETOY v. EDWARDS
[Kekewich, J., 239 [North, J., 62 [Q. B. Div. 168, (Affirmed on Appeal) C. A. 189 V. PRACTICE-PLEADING-Adding parties 7. — Chief clerk's certificate finding a
22. - Originating summons - Jurisdic--Trustee and cestui que trust -- Rules of sum due for occupation rent-Motion to vary
tion-Question between legal devisees-Rules Sopreme Court, 1883, Order xvi., rr. 2, 11. certificate-Motion, before the expiration of
| of Supreme Court, 1883, Orier Lv., rr. 3, 5, 6. BESLEY 0. BESLEY - - Chitty, J., 10 eight days from date of filing, for leave to
In re Davies. Davies v. Davies
[North, J., 34 2. — Default in plending-Counter-claim distrain for the rent or for security to be given, - New parties-Moving for judgment-Orders ordered to stand over-Rules of Supreme Court,
23. - Originating summons — JurisdicJIL, r. 12; xxxII., r. 6; LXVII., r. 4. VERNEY 1883, Order Lv., r. 70. CRAVEN V. INGHAM
tion-Question on construction of a deed 7. THOMAS - - Kekewich, J., 20
[Stirling, J., 83 Rules of Supreme Court, 1883, Order Lv., r. 3. 3. — Default in pleading to counter-claim 8. Declaration of future rights-Dis
In re GLADSTONE. GLADSTONE v. BLUMENTHAL
(North, J., 185 - Motion for judgment on counter-claim - cretion-Rules of Supreme Court, 1883, Order Order XXVII., 1. 11. Higgins v. SCOTT
XXV., r. 5. In re BERENS. BERENS v. BERENS 24. - Originating summons or writ[Q. B. Div. 84
[Chitty, J., 95 | Release — Setting aside — Rules of Supreme 4. — Default of defence — Action for 9. - Default of appearance-Rules of
Court, 1883, Order Lv., r. 3. In re ELLIS. Supreme Court, 1883, Order 1x, r. 15; Order
KELSON v. ELLIS specific performance-Rules of Supreme Court,
- - Kay, J., 217 1883, Order XXVII., 1. 11. Smith v. BUCHAN' LXX., r. 1-Service of writ, indorsement of 25. - Prohibition Proceedings on Crown
Kay, J., 119 | Day of the week omitted-Objection by Regis- | side of Queen's Bench Division-Proceeding 5. - Particulars-Instigation to improper
trar. Foat v. BASSET - Stirling, J., 255 as pauper - Rules of Supreme Court, 1883, Act-Improper motives — Adjournment into
10. - Discovery — Action by share Order xvi., r. 22; Order LXVIII., r. 1. MULCourt-Costs-Rules of the Supreme Court. | holders — Confidential communications - LEN EISEN v. COULSON AND ANOTHER (No. 2)
[Q. B. Div. 124 1883, Order XIX, rr. 6, 7. BRITON MEDICAL, | Privilege. GOURARD V. EDISON GOWER BELL, EC, LIFE ASSOCIATION r. BRITANNIA FIRE &c., COMPANY - Chitty, J., 82, (Affirmed on 26. - Service of writ- Defendant com- Kay, J., 245
[Appeal) C. A. 94 | pany having registered office at Glasgow-