Voice and Involvement at Work: Experience with Non-Union RepresentationPaul J. Gollan, Bruce E. Kaufman, Daphne Taras, Adrian Wilkinson In the last decade, nonunion employee representation (NER) has become a much discussed topic in the fields of human resource management, employment relations, and employment/labor law. This book examines the purpose, structure, and performance of various types of employee representation bodies created by companies in non-union settings to promote collective forums for voice and involvement at the workplace. This unique volume presents the first longitudinal evidence on the performance, success, and failure of NER plans over an extended time period. Consisting of twelve detailed, in-depth case studies of actual NER plans in operation across four countries, this volume provides unparalleled evidence on such matters as: the motives behind the initial establishment of NER, different organizational forms of NER in industry, key success and failure factors over the long-term, pro and con evaluations for employers and employees, and more. Voice and Involvement at Work captures an unequalled international and comparative perspective through a wide cross-section of different NER forms. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 93
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Voice and involvement at work : experience with non-union representation/ edited by Paul J. Gollan, Bruce E. Kaufman, Daphne Taras, ... Management—Employee participation.
7 Partnership at Eurotunnel: Challenges for NER and Union Representation PAUL J. GOLLAN AND SENIA KALFA PART III Canada 8 10 A Century of Employee Representation at Imperial Oil DAPHNE G. TARAS 9 Non-Union Employee Representation in the ...
Certainly employees and the human resource function are a case in point. ... Traditionally, the major institution for employee voice and involvement has been the independent labour union, often promoted as a way to achieve industrial ...
and Rogers (1999) call an employee participation–representation gap. For this reason, and also from concern about boosting workplace productivity and national economic performance, interest in business, academic, and policy-making ...
Many HRM researchers instead look at employee voice structures as a management communicationinvolvement tool evaluated primarily by their effect on organizational performance (Klaas, Olson-Buchanan, and Ward 2012).
What people are saying - Write a review
Contents
1 | |
PART I Australia | 43 |
PART II Britain | 125 |
PART III Canada | 195 |
PART IV United States | 293 |
Contributors | 395 |
Index | 397 |
Other editions - View all
Voice and Involvement at Work: Experience with Non-union Representation Paul Gollan No preview available - 2015 |