Freedom within Reason
Philosophers typically see the issue of free will and determinism in terms of a debate between two standard positions. Incompatibilism holds that freedom and responsibility require causal and metaphysical independence from the impersonal forces of nature. According to compatibilism, people are free and responsible as long as their actions are governed by their desires. In Freedom Within Reason, Susan Wolf charts a path between these traditional positions: We are not free and responsible, she argues, for actions that are governed by desires that we cannot help having. But the wish to form our own desires from nothing is both futile and arbitrary. Some of the forces beyond our control are friends to freedom rather than enemies of it: they endow us with faculties of reason, perception, and imagination, and provide us with the data by which we come to see and appreciate the world for what it is. The independence we want, Wolf argues, is not independence from the world, but independence from forces that prevent or preclude us from choosing how to live in light of a sufficient appreciation of the world. The freedom we want is a freedom within reason and the world.
1 The Dilemma of Autonomy In Which the Problems of Responsibility and Free Will Are Presented
2 The Real Self View In Which a Nonautonomous Conception of Free Will and Responsibility is Examined and Criticized
3 The Autonomy View In Which an Autonomous Conception of Free Will and Responsibility Is Examined and Criticized
4 The Reason View In Which a Nonautonomous Conception of Free Will and Responsibility Is Proposed
5 Ability and Possibility In Which the Implications of Determinism for Responsibility Are Discussed
ability to act ability to choose able accordance with Reason act in accordance agent's real alternative answer appreciate auton autonomous agent Autonomy View basis behavior believe Carson City Chapter choice claim compatibilists compatible concept of responsibility condition of autonomy condition of responsibility constraint context deserve praise desires example fact faculties free and responsible freedom and responsibility God’s govern grade papers hypnosis imply incompatibilism insofar intuitions J. L. Austin justified kind kleptomaniac level of explanation metaethical metaphysical moral necessary for responsibility nihilism nihilist nonautonomous agent Nonetheless Normative Pluralism objectivity of values one’s actions ourselves person philosophical plausible position praise and blame problem of responsibility proponents question rational Real Self View Reason View recognize relevant requires responsibility and free responsible agent right reasons right thing Rose's seems sense status status of responsibility subjectivism subjectivist suggestion Thomas Nagel thought tion True understand valuational system value judgments