Contemporary Newtonian ResearchZ. Bechler them in his cheat-preface to Copernicus De Revolutionibus, but the main change in their import has been that whereas Osiander defended Copernicus, Mach and Duhem defended science. The modem conception of hypothetico deductive science is, again, geared to defend the respectability of science in much the same way: the physical interpretation, it says, is merely and always hypothetical, and so the scientist is never really committed to it. Hence, when science sheds the physical interpretation off its mathematical skeleton as time and refutation catch up with it, the scientist is not really caught in error, for he never was committed to this interpretation in the first place. This is the apologetic essence of present day, Popper-like, versions of the idea of science as a mathematical-core-cum-interpretational shell. This is also Cohen's view, for it aims to free Newton of any existential commitment to which his theory might allegedly commit him. It will be readily seen that Cohen regards this methodological distinction between mathematics and physics to be the backbone of the Newtonian revolution in science (which is, in its tum, the climax of the whole Scientific Revolution) for a very clear reason: it enables us to argue that Newton could use freely the new concept of centripetal force, even though he did not be lieve in physical action at a distance and could not conceive how such a force could act to produce its effects". ([3] pp. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 45
Page 8
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 24
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 25
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 26
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 42
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action actually aether alchemy Alexandre Koyré analysis argues argument bodies Book Cambridge Cartesian cause celestial celestial dynamics centripetal force claim Cohen conatus conceived concerning corporeal Correspondence Derek Thomas Descartes distance Divine dynamics early earth edition electric spirit electrical attraction ellipse endeavour of receding epistemology Essay existence experiment extended space fact figures geometry glass Gravitatione Guerlac Hall Herivel Hermeticism Hooke hypothesis Ibid ideas indivisible infinite extension infinity inverse-square law inversely Isaac Newton Kepler's Kepler's third law Koyré laws of Kepler Leibniz Locke and Newton Locke's London mathematical Mathematical Papers matter mechanics mind minima moon moon's Motu mutual natural philosophy Newton's conception Newton's view Newtonian style ontology Opticks orbits particles phenomena physical planetary planets position Principia principles problem prop Queries question Royal Society Scholium scientific sense substance subtle spirit theological theory things third law tion uncreated universal gravity Westfall Whiteside Yahuda