Social Welfare and Individual Responsibility
Kendrick Professor of Philosophy and Eller Chair of Service-Dominant Logic David Schmidtz, David Schmidtz, Robert E. Goodin, Robert Edward Goodin
Cambridge University Press, Aug 13, 1998 - Philosophy - 222 pages
The issue of social welfare and individual responsibility has become a topic of international public debate in recent years as politicians around the world now question the legitimacy of state-funded welfare programs. David Schmidtz and Robert Goodin debate the ethical merits of individual versus collective responsibility for welfare. David Schmidtz argues that social welfare policy should prepare people for responsible adulthood rather than try to make that unnecessary. Robert Goodin argues against the individualization of welfare policy and expounds the virtues of collective responsibility.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
actually AFDC appropriation arguments assistance become benefits better blame cause chap choice claim collective collectivism communal concept consequences contribute costs course create dependency discussion economic effective equal example externalities fact fail forces friendly societies future giving Goodin guarantee income increase individual institutions internalize issues justice kind labor land least leave less live looking matter means merely moral mutual natural offer option particular people's percent perhaps personal responsibility perspective philosophical political poor position practice present problem productive programs question rates reason recipients regime rely remain risks schemes Security seems self-reliance sense shares simply social welfare society sometimes sort structural take responsibility tend things tion unemployment values welfare mothers