Just War Thinking: Morality and Pragmatism in the Struggle Against Contemporary Threats
Just War Thinking: Morality and Pragmatism in the Struggle Against Contemporary Threats reconsiders the intersection between morality and pragmatism in foreign policy and modern warfare. Whereas recent explications of "Just War theory" neglect how twenty-first century wars differ from the old wars that Just War doctrine was originally designed for, this book argues that a political ethic of responsibility should motivate the contemporary application of military force by states in order to protect international security and human life. Just War Thinking criticizes the quasi-pacifism of most formal Just War scholarship, reconceptualizes a minimal, realistic "just war thinking" framework for exploring foreign and military policy options, and evaluates the usefulness of this approach by investigating contemporary cases such as the war on terrorism in Afghanistan and Iraq, the call for assassination of political leaders, and military humanitarian intervention. Finally, the book considers new challenges to pragmatic yet moral policies: the neglect of jus post bellum (justice at war's end); the challenge of public opinion, democratic processes, and supranational institutions to policies based on just war thinking; and the erosive power of postmodernism to the normative structures guiding Western decision-makers.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Old Wars vs New Wars The Challenges of the 21st Century
The Triumphs and Failings of Just War Thinking
Political Responsibility and the Decision to go to War jus ad helium
Fighting to Win The Nexus of Morality and Practicality jus in bello
Finishing Well Security and Punishment at Wars End jus post bellum
Other editions - View all
action Afghanistan American applied approach appropriate Aquinas argues argument attack Augustine authority calls Cambridge cause chapter Christian citizens civil civilians combatants conflict consider consideration contemporary context criteria decision defense destruction discrimination discussion doctrine early employ enemy engage ethical example failed fighting force hand historical human humanitarian intervention individual intent interests Iraq issues jus ad bellum jus in bello jus post bellum justice killing leaders legitimate limited lives mass means military moral Moreover nature neighbors non-combatant notion pacifism past peace political position possible practical principle proportionality protect punishment Qaeda question reasons recent regime resort responsibility society soldiers suggests terrorism terrorists theory thinking threats tion traditional twenty-first century United University Press values violence War theory war thinking war's end warfare wars weapons Western York