Casenote Legal Briefs: Adaptable to Courses Utilizing Gunther's Casebook on Constitutional Law. Constitutional lawNorman S. Goldenberg, Peter Tenen For over two decades, Casenote Legal Briefs have helped hundreds of thousands of students prepare for classes and exams year after year with unparalleled results. Known throughout the law school community as high-quality legal study aids, Casenotes popular series of legal briefs are the most comprehensive legal briefs available today. With over 100 Casenotes published today in all key areas, ranging from Administrative Law to Wills, Trusts, and Estates each and every Casenote offers: professionally written briefs of the cases in your casebook coverage that is accurate and up-to-date editor's analysis explaining the relevance of each case To the course coverage built on decades of experience the highest commitment to quality and don't forget Aspen's other popular study aids: Click here to buy all your study aids |
Common terms and phrases
abortion affirmed applied Authority to Reach basis Brennan burden casebook Casenote Law Outline Casenote Legal Briefs challenged Civil Rights claim clear and present Commerce Clause commercial speech compelling CONCISE RULE conduct Congress Congressional Authority Constitutional Law constitutionally Contracts conviction criminal discrimination discriminatory district court doctrine Due Process Clause EDITOR'S ANALYSIS elections enacted enforcement Equal Protection Clause Establishment Clause expression FACT SUMMARY Fourteenth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment Liberty Freedom of Speech fundamental right HOLDING AND DECISION imposed interstate commerce invalid ISSUE judicial review jurisdiction justified limited NAACP NATURE NOTES obscene ordinance Outline on Constitutional political power to regulate present danger Privileges and Immunities Professor of Law prohibit public schools purpose question race racial Reach Private Action religion religious requirements residents restriction RULE OF LAW separation of powers standard state's statute strict scrutiny substantial Supreme Court unconstitutional upheld valid violates the Equal voting York