Equal in fame to proudest conquerors. Much suff'ring heroes next their Those of less noisy, and less guilty fame, 100 105 I honour my Father, I seek not mine own glory, says our Saviour in St. John's Gospel, viii. 49, 50: and this he urgeth as a proof of his divine mission, vii. 18. He that speaketh of himself, seeketh his own glory: but he that seeketh his glory that sent him, the same is true, and no unrighteousness is in him. 109. Think not so slight of glory; &c.] There is nothing throughout the whole poem more expressive of the true character of the Tempter than this reply. There is in it all the real falsehood of the father of lies, and the glozing subtlety of an insidious deceiver. The argument is false and unsound, and yet it is veiled over with a certain plausible air of truth. The poet has also by introducing this furnished himself with an opportunity of explaining that great question in divinity, why God created the world, and what is meant by that glory which he expects from his creatures. This may be no improper place to observe to the reader the author's great art in Resembling thy great Father: he seeks glory, Glory from men, from all men good or bad, weaving into the body of so short a work so many grand points of the Christian theology and morality. Thyer. 118. Promiscuous from all nations,] The poet puts here into the mouth of the Devil the absurd notions of the apologists for Paganism. See Themistius, Orat. xii. de Relig. Valent. Imp. TauTa νομιζε γενέσθαι &c. p. 160. War burton. See the Divine Legation, b. ii. sect. vi. vol. ii. p. 308. ed. 1811, and the note on that passage, for several instances of persons professing these notions. Dunster. 121. To whom our Saviour fervently replied.] As this poem consists chiefly of a dialogue between the Tempter and our Saviour, the poet must have laboured under some difficulty in composing a sufficient variety of introductory lines to the several speeches, and it required great art and judgment to vary and adapt them so properly as he hath done to the subject in hand. 110 115 120 We took notice of a beauty of this kind in a note upon ii. 432: and here we have another instance not unworthy of our observation. When the Tempter had proposed to our Saviour the baits and allurements of glory, he was nothing moved, but replied with great calmness and composure of mind, ver. 43. To whom our Saviour calmly thus replied: but now the Tempter reflects upon the glory of God, our Saviour is warmed upon the occasion, and answers with some eagerness and fervour. To whom our Saviour fervently replied. And this is perfectly just, and agreeable to the true character of our Saviour, who was all meekness and forbearance in every thing that related to himself, but where God's honour was concerned, was warm and zealous ; as when he drove the buyers and sellers out of the temple, in And reason; since his word all things produc'd, For so much good, so much beneficence. But why should man seek glory, who' of his own somuch that the disciples applied to him the saying of the Psalmist, The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up, John ii. 17. 128. The slightest, easiest, readiest recompense] The same sentiment in the Paradise Lost, iv. 46. What could be less than to afford him praise, 125 130 135 140 which spoils the sense of the passage. 138. recreant] Shakespeare has the word, K. John, act iii. s. 2. And Spenser, Faery Qu. b. ii. c. vi. 28. where Mr. Warton observes, that recreant knight is a term of romance, citing a passage from the Morte Arthur. Recreant, or recreditus, in the The easiest recompense, and pay him feudal signification, imported the thanks, How due! 130. And not returning that] We have replaced the reading of the first edition: most of the later editions have it And not returning what highest degree of treason, baseness, and cowardice. Du Cange says, "probrosum adeo censuit vocabulum ut illud describere noluerit Radulphus de Glanvilla." Dunster. That which to God alone of right belongs; So spake the Son of God; and here again Of glory, as thou wilt, said he, so deem, 151. Worth or not worth the seeking,] In all the editions which I have seen except the first, it is printed Worth or not worth their seeking, but the first edition exhibits this reading, Worth or not worth the seeking. 158. Reduc'd a province under Roman yoke,] Judæa was reduced to the form of a Roman province, in the reign of Augustus, by Quirinius or Cyrenius, then governor of Syria; and Coponius, a Roman of the equestrian order, was appointed to go 145 150 155 vern it under the title of Procurator of Judæa; our Saviour being then (as Dean Prideaux says) in the twelfth year of his age, but according to the vulgar æra, which begins four years later than the true time, it was A.D. 8. Nor is always rul'd with temp'rate sway: and indeed the Roman government was not always the most temperate. At this time Pontius Pilate was procurator of Judæa; and if history be true, he was a most corrupt and flagitious governor. See particularly Philo de Legatione ad Caium. 159. It is there related of Pi With temp❜rate sway; oft have they violated late, that he had erected and dedicated some golden shields to Tiberius, not more to do honour to the emperor than to vex the people. On their petitioning him to remove them, he is described as replying to them with much severity, and as being of an inexorable disposition, rsppas αντιλέγοντος, ην γαρ την φυσιν ακαπτης. On this the Jews threatened to apply to Tiberius himself, whereupon Pilate began to fear, lest his various other misconducts should be reported to the emperor. Leg. ad Caium, p. 799. ed. Col. Allob. Josephus, Antiq. Jud. xviii. 5, speaks of the murders committed on the Jews by Pilate. Dunster. 160.oft have they violated The temple, &c.] As Pompey did particularly with several of his officers, who entered not only into the holy place, but also penetrated into the holy of holies, where none were permitted by the law to enter, except the high-priest alone once in a year, on the great day of expiation. And this profanation of the temple might well remind the author of a former one by Antiochus Epiphanes. See 2 Maccab. v. 160 165 165. So did not Maccabeus:] The Tempter had compared the profanation of the temple by the Romans to that by Antiochus Epiphanes, king of Syria; and now he would infer that Jesus was to blame for not vindicating his country against the one, as Judas Maceabeus had done against the other. He fled indeed into the wilderness from the persecutions of Antiochus, but there he took up arms against him, and obtained so many victories over his forces, that he recovered the city and sanctuary out of their hands, and his family was in his brother Jonathan advanced to the high priesthood, and in his brother Simon to the principality, and so they continued for several descents sovereign pontiffs and sovereign princes of the Jewish nation till the time of Herod the Great: though their father Mattathias (the son of John, the son of Simon, the son of Asmonæus, from whom the family had the name of Asmonæans) was no more than a priest of the course of Joarib, and dwelt at Modin, which is famous for nothing so much as being the country of the Maccabees. See 1 Maccab. Josephus, Prideaux, &c. |