Ambiguity and choice in organizations |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 48
Page 317
This was true for a majority of the faculty, the students, the research assistants,
and the technical-administrative staff. The chief body of university governance (
the Collegium) did not involve itself. The faculty in other departments seems to
have ...
This was true for a majority of the faculty, the students, the research assistants,
and the technical-administrative staff. The chief body of university governance (
the Collegium) did not involve itself. The faculty in other departments seems to
have ...
Page 322
The students, assistants, and the technical and administrative staff never became
activated. It should be added that the absolute level of activity was low. In terms of
the number of meetings held, the number of people involved, and the degree ...
The students, assistants, and the technical and administrative staff never became
activated. It should be added that the absolute level of activity was low. In terms of
the number of meetings held, the number of people involved, and the degree ...
Page 327
fessors, 8 assistant professors, 1 student, and 1 representative from the technical
administrative staff. Another important change was the introduction of standing
committees, first for teaching and personnel policies, then for research. Formally
...
fessors, 8 assistant professors, 1 student, and 1 representative from the technical
administrative staff. Another important change was the introduction of standing
committees, first for teaching and personnel policies, then for research. Formally
...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Acknowledgments | 7 |
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Organizational Learning and the Ambiguity of the Past | 54 |
Copyright | |
13 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity architecture assembly attention attitudes behavior beliefs Board candidates chairman choice opportunity choice situations College concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making Department of Physics discussion District effects energy enrollment expect faculty members formal authority formal participation full professors garbage garbage can model goals Hedmark hierarchical house meeting illegitimacy important individual interest interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less level of aspiration major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway observed Olsen Oppland organizational choices outcomes parents perceived percent political position presidents problems and solutions procedures profes professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee social structure teacher group Telemark tenured theory tion Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo variables Vest-Agder Vestfold Vice-Chancellor vote