Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 93
Page 3
... Ambiguity of Relevance 2.0 Introduction 24 2.1 Garbage Can Decision Processes 26 2.2 Organizational Structure 27 2.3 Implications 32 3. Attention and the Ambiguity of Self - interest . 3.0 Introduction 38 3.1 3.2 Attention Structures 40 ...
... Ambiguity of Relevance 2.0 Introduction 24 2.1 Garbage Can Decision Processes 26 2.2 Organizational Structure 27 2.3 Implications 32 3. Attention and the Ambiguity of Self - interest . 3.0 Introduction 38 3.1 3.2 Attention Structures 40 ...
Page 8
... ambiguity - goals that are unclear , technologies that are imperfectly understood , histories that are difficult to interpret , and participants who wander in and out . It is in the tradition of theories of organizational decision ...
... ambiguity - goals that are unclear , technologies that are imperfectly understood , histories that are difficult to interpret , and participants who wander in and out . It is in the tradition of theories of organizational decision ...
Page 48
... ambiguity of purpose . In what terms can action be justified ? What are the goals of the organization ? The second is the ambiguity of power . How powerful is the president ? What can he accomplish ? The third is the ambiguity of ...
... ambiguity of purpose . In what terms can action be justified ? What are the goals of the organization ? The second is the ambiguity of power . How powerful is the president ? What can he accomplish ? The third is the ambiguity of ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Introduction | 54 |
Copyright | |
17 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade accepted action active administrative alternative assembly associate assume attention attitudes become behavior beliefs Board candidates chairman choice opportunities clear College completely concerns consider consistent deadline dean decided decision demands discussion District educational effects energy established existing expect fact faculty faculty members flow formal four garbage give given goals governance grade house meeting ideas important increase indicate individual interest interpretation involved issues leaders less major March non-leaders observed organization organizational outcomes parents participation particular perceived period persons physics political position possible present problems procedures produced professional professors proposal question rational reasons relatively reorganization response result school committee situation social solutions strong structure suggest Table teachers theory tion Tromsø values vote