Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 3
Page 94
... exploiting special competance to develop national preeminence in areas that had not been developed at the major institutions . These statements clearly reflect the high level of aspirations among the faculty in the school . The ideology ...
... exploiting special competance to develop national preeminence in areas that had not been developed at the major institutions . These statements clearly reflect the high level of aspirations among the faculty in the school . The ideology ...
Page 181
... exploit the difficulties departments have in looking more than one year ahead . With some understanding of the system , in fact he can probably do more than most academic administrators do . But he acts within a rather tight set of ...
... exploit the difficulties departments have in looking more than one year ahead . With some understanding of the system , in fact he can probably do more than most academic administrators do . But he acts within a rather tight set of ...
Page 231
... exploit their computer facilities in a desegregation planning process . Anxious to use desegre- gation planning as a means to strengthen their capability to collect and analyze diverse types of data for a variety of planning purposes ...
... exploit their computer facilities in a desegregation planning process . Anxious to use desegre- gation planning as a means to strengthen their capability to collect and analyze diverse types of data for a variety of planning purposes ...
Contents
Acknowledgments | 7 |
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest X3 | 38 |
Copyright | |
17 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade teacher academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity architecture arena assembly attention attitudes August 27 behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunity choice situations College concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making demands desegregation discussion District educational effects energy expect faculty members formal participation full professors garbage garbage can model goals hierarchical house meeting ideology implementation important individual interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway Norwegian November 25 observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organization organizational choices outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenured theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo variables Vice-Chancellor vote