Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 26
Page 321
... professors , one junior faculty and the secretary who later became department - secretary in the physics department . Other groups either reacted , trying to delay the decisions and win time , or they ignored the choice . The junior faculty ...
... professors , one junior faculty and the secretary who later became department - secretary in the physics department . Other groups either reacted , trying to delay the decisions and win time , or they ignored the choice . The junior faculty ...
Page 326
... junior faculty in the university at large tried to have the problem of junior faculty participation related to the choice . They perceived it as easier to have a formal representation of junior faculty accepted in the Department of ...
... junior faculty in the university at large tried to have the problem of junior faculty participation related to the choice . They perceived it as easier to have a formal representation of junior faculty accepted in the Department of ...
Page 328
... junior faculty could meet again over the same issues of the rights , power , and status of junior faculty . The most visible of these meetings took place in departments in the humanities and the social sciences . Here students and ...
... junior faculty could meet again over the same issues of the rights , power , and status of junior faculty . The most visible of these meetings took place in departments in the humanities and the social sciences . Here students and ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Introduction | 54 |
Copyright | |
17 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade accepted action active administrative alternative assembly associate assume attention attitudes become behavior beliefs Board candidates chairman choice opportunities clear College completely concerns consider consistent deadline dean decided decision demands discussion District educational effects energy established existing expect fact faculty faculty members flow formal four garbage give given goals governance grade house meeting ideas important increase indicate individual interest interpretation involved issues leaders less major March non-leaders observed organization organizational outcomes parents participation particular perceived period persons physics political position possible present problems procedures produced professional professors proposal question rational reasons relatively reorganization response result school committee situation social solutions strong structure suggest Table teachers theory tion Tromsø values vote