Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 85
Page 183
... major public universities and some private universities in the United States . They represent a major locus of growth in American higher education in the period from 1950 to 1965 . Type C is the college for which research reputation is ...
... major public universities and some private universities in the United States . They represent a major locus of growth in American higher education in the period from 1950 to 1965 . Type C is the college for which research reputation is ...
Page 189
... major faculty groups . The price of a requirement in humanities is a requirement in natural sciences . The major participants will not ordinarily see it that way , of course . Policy is negotiated without clear distinctions between ...
... major faculty groups . The price of a requirement in humanities is a requirement in natural sciences . The major participants will not ordinarily see it that way , of course . Policy is negotiated without clear distinctions between ...
Page 383
... major role in the development of belief that the outcomes were almost incidental . The three features are , of course , interconnected . Where the decision process performs major symbolic functions ( Edelman , 1964 ) , there will be a ...
... major role in the development of belief that the outcomes were almost incidental . The three features are , of course , interconnected . Where the decision process performs major symbolic functions ( Edelman , 1964 ) , there will be a ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Introduction | 54 |
Copyright | |
17 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade teacher academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity architecture arena assembly attention attitudes August 27 behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations College concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making demands desegregation discussion District educational effects energy expect faculty members formal participation full professors garbage garbage can model goals hierarchical house meeting ideology implementation important individual interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway Norwegian November 25 observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organization organizational choices outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenured theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo variables Vice-Chancellor vote