Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 30
Page 89
... norms of " equality " among participants can accept a " democratic " political process but not one that exposes power and status differences . Universities are apparently institutions with strong " rationality " and " equality " norms ...
... norms of " equality " among participants can accept a " democratic " political process but not one that exposes power and status differences . Universities are apparently institutions with strong " rationality " and " equality " norms ...
Page 199
... norms of equality apply . In general , we would expect to find the degree of acceptance of the power model to increase with the degree of conflict in the organization , the size of the organization , the average pleasure derived from ...
... norms of equality apply . In general , we would expect to find the degree of acceptance of the power model to increase with the degree of conflict in the organization , the size of the organization , the average pleasure derived from ...
Page 274
... norms , resource distribution , and interpretive themes that produced systematic bias in the drift . Moreover , the differential participation rates assured that the norms reflected by relatively frequent participants normally directed ...
... norms , resource distribution , and interpretive themes that produced systematic bias in the drift . Moreover , the differential participation rates assured that the norms reflected by relatively frequent participants normally directed ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Introduction | 54 |
Copyright | |
17 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade teacher academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity architecture arena assembly attention attitudes August 27 behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations College concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making demands desegregation discussion District educational effects energy expect faculty members formal participation full professors garbage garbage can model goals hierarchical house meeting ideology implementation important individual interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway Norwegian November 25 observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organization organizational choices outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenured theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo variables Vice-Chancellor vote