Ambiguity and choice in organizations |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 92
Page 28
In the former case we talk about the decision structure; in the ratter of the access
structure. The decision structure is a mapping of individuals on choice
opportunities (or classes of choice opportunities). If we have N potential
participants and M ...
In the former case we talk about the decision structure; in the ratter of the access
structure. The decision structure is a mapping of individuals on choice
opportunities (or classes of choice opportunities). If we have N potential
participants and M ...
Page 41
Actual structures will, of course, only approximate these pure types, but they are
convenient for our discussion and will permit us to illustrate the major points we
wish to make. r- The attention structure is important. In a highly segmented ...
Actual structures will, of course, only approximate these pure types, but they are
convenient for our discussion and will permit us to illustrate the major points we
wish to make. r- The attention structure is important. In a highly segmented ...
Page 163
Time-line of decision Date Arena Agenda Events 1971 Assembly Oct. 8 Oct. 1 1
School board Paper on 1) general discussion of the paper pedagogical 2) airing
of dissatisfaction over teachers goals and and structure structures 3) teachers ...
Time-line of decision Date Arena Agenda Events 1971 Assembly Oct. 8 Oct. 1 1
School board Paper on 1) general discussion of the paper pedagogical 2) airing
of dissatisfaction over teachers goals and and structure structures 3) teachers ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Acknowledgments | 7 |
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Organizational Learning and the Ambiguity of the Past | 54 |
Copyright | |
13 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity architecture assembly attention attitudes behavior beliefs Board candidates chairman choice opportunity choice situations College concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making Department of Physics discussion District effects energy enrollment expect faculty members formal authority formal participation full professors garbage garbage can model goals Hedmark hierarchical house meeting illegitimacy important individual interest interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less level of aspiration major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway observed Olsen Oppland organizational choices outcomes parents perceived percent political position presidents problems and solutions procedures profes professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee social structure teacher group Telemark tenured theory tion Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo variables Vest-Agder Vestfold Vice-Chancellor vote