Page images

What fire is in mine ears”—The popular opinion “ — SMIRCHED, worm-eaten tapestry'-i. e. Soiled, here alluded to is as old as Pliny :-" Moreover, is not obscured. this an opinion generally received, that when our ears

“ – a' wears a lock"-It was one of the fantastic do glow and tingle, some there be that in our absence

fashions of Shakespeare's day, for men to cultivate a do talk of us ?"-(Holland's “ Translation," book xxviii.)

favourite lock of hair, which was brought before, tied

with ribands, and called a love-lock. It was against SCENE II.

this practice that Prynne wrote his treatise on the " — to show a child his new coat, and forbid him to “ Unlovelyness of Love-locks." It appears from Manwear it" --Shakespeare seldom repeats himself; but, in zoni's Italian novel, “ I Promessi Sposi," that, in the ROMEO AND JUliet, there is a passage similar to the sixteenth century, wearing a lock was made penal, in above:

Lombardy, as the sign of a lawless life. Italian fashions As is the night before some festival,

were so much talked of in England, that the Poet might To an impatient child that hath new robes

have known this, and alluded to it. And may not wear them. all scors"-i. e. Large breeches, or trousers.

SCENE IV. Hence, a slop-seller, for one who furnishes seamen, etc., with clothes.

- your other RABATO"-An ornament for the neck,

a kind of ruff, such as we often see in the portraits of "- his jesting spirit, which is now crept into a lute

Queen Elizabeth. Decker calls them “your stiff-necked string”-i. e. His jocular wit is now employed in the

rebaloes." Menage derives it from rebattre-to put inditing of love-songs, which, in Shakespeare's time, back. were usually accompanied on the lute. The “stops" are the frets of the lute, and those points on the finger “ — set with pearls, down sleeves"—i. e. The pearls board on which the string is pressed, or stopped, by the

are to be set down the sleeves. finger.

- side sleeves"-Long sleeves, or full sleeves, " Good den, brother"-"Good den” is a colloquial from the Anglo-Saxon sid; ample, long. The “deep abridgment of good even, but it was also used for good

and broad sleeves” of the time of Henry IV. are thus day: and, in act v. scene 1, Don Pedro says, good den,

ridiculed by Hoccleve :and Claudio, good day.

Now bath this land little neede of broomes

To sweepe away the filth out of the streete,

Sen side-sleeres of pennilesse groomes

Will it up licke, be it drie or weete. "have a care that your bills be not stolen"—The

-Light o' love'—This is the name of an old bill" was a formidable weapon in the hands of the old

dance tune, mentioned in the Two GENTLEMEN OF VEEnglish infantry. “It gave (says Temple) the most ghastly and deplorable wounds.” Dr. Johnson states

RONA, act i. scene 2. (See Chappell's “ Ancient Eng

lish Airs," where the words of a song to the tune of that, when he wrote, the “bill" was still carried by the watchmen of Litchfield, his native town. It was a long

• Light o’ Love" are given.) weapon, with a point shaped somewhat like an axe.

the letter that begins them all, H"-This con

ceit, as well as similar jokes in contemporary writers, If you hear a child cry in the night—This part

shows that the word, which we now pronounce ake, of the sapient Dogberry's charge may have been suggested by some of the amusing provisions contained in

was, in Shakespeare's time, pronounced aitch. Beathe “Statutes of the Streets," imprinted by Wolfe, in

trice says, she is ill for an H, (aitch,) the letter that be. 1595. For instance—"22. No man shall blow any

gins each of the three words—hawk, horse, and husband. horne in the night, within the citie, or whistle after the

J. P. Kemble had a long contention with the public on houre of nyne of the clock in the night, under paine of

this point. When playing Prospero, he always persisted imprisonment.–30. No man shall, after the houre of

in saying, “Fill all thy bones with aitches;" and the nyne at night, keep any rule, whereby any such sud

public (particularly those of the upper regions, who daine outcry be made in the still of the night; as mak

are always most intolerant of singularity), as pertinaing any affray, or beating his wife or servant, or singing ciously hissed him for presuming to be right, out of or revyling [revelling) in his house, to the disturbance

The gods and Cato did in this divide. of his neighbours, under paine of iis. iiüid.,'' etc., etc.

W. Scott gives the history of J. P. Kemble's threat“— Keep your fellows' counsels and your own” ening Caliban with aitches, with great humour. “ This is part of the oath of a grand juryman; and is Another authority in the actor's favour is found in one of many proofs of Shakespeare's having been very Heywood's “ Epigrams," (1566:)conversant, at some period of his life, with legal pro

H is worst among letters in the cross-row; ceedings and courts of justice."-Malone.

For if thou find him, either in thine elbow,

In thine arm or leg, in any degree; I know that Deformed”-In the induction to his

In thine head, or teeth, or toe, or knee ;“Bartholomew Fair,” we find Ben Jonson aiming a

Into what place soever H may pike him, satirical stroke at this scene :-“And then a substantial

Wherever thou find ache, thou shalt not like him. watch to have stole in upon 'em, and taken them away, - an you be not turned Turk"-This phrase was with mistaking words, as the fashion is in the stage commonly applied to express a change of condition, or practice.”. Jonson himself, however, in his “ Tale of a opinion. Hamlet talks of his fortune turning Turk. Tub," makes his wise men of Finsbury blunder in the

Boswell, in his edition of Malone's " — carduus benedictus"-" Carduus benedictus, or SHAKESPEARE, points out examples of this sort of blessed thistle, (says Cogan, in his ‘Haven of Health, humour before Shakespeare's time. Nash, in his “ An 1589,) so worthily named for the singular virtues that it atomy of Absurditie,” (1589,) speaks of “a misterming hath." clowne in a comedie;" and in “Selimus, Emperor of the Turks,” (1594,) this speech is put into the mouth

SCENE V. of Bullithrumble, a shepherd :-“Well, if


will keepe my sheepe truly and honestly, keeping your

PALABRAS, neighbour Verges"-How this Span. hands from lying and slandering, and your tongue from

ish word came into our language, and to be in familiar

use with the lower orders, it is difficult to ascertain. picking and stealing, you shall be Maister Bullithramble's servitures."

Sly, in the “Induction” to the TAMING OF THE Shrew,

has pocas palabras; and the same words are found in “ — REECHY painting”-i. e. Painting (says Stevens) the popular old play, the “Spanish Tragedy," where discoloured by smoke.

they are spoken by Hieronimo, act iv. scene 4.


same manner.

" — if I were as tedious as a king, I could find in my heart to bestow it all of your worship"-Hazlitt remarks upon the quaint blundering of the inimitable Dogberry and Verges, that they are “a standing record of that formal gravity of pretension, and total want of common understanding, which Shakespeare, no doubt, copied from real life; and which, in the course of two hundred years. appear to have ascended from the lowest to the highest offices of the state." The political sarcasm, as to the inheritance of the wisdom of these functionaries, has, I hope, but little application on our side of the Atlantic; but the desire to bestow all their tediousness upon their friends is, unquestionably, a characteristic in which the public men of America are not a jot behind the municipal dignitaries of the Messina watch.

" — we rack the value"-i. e. We raise the estimate to the utmost—a sense now retained only in the phrase rack rent.

- count confect"-Beatrice gives him this title in contempt. We still speak of caraway confects. She first calls him “count," and then mentions his title, “count confect"-"a sweet gallant, surely!" This is the old reading, which, without reason, has been changed to “a goodly count-confect."

SCENE II. Sexton"—He is called “town-clerk” in the old stage-directions, probably because, being able to read and write, he acted as clerk for the town, or for such of the inhabitants as had not his accomplishments.


[ocr errors]


ACT V.-SCENE I. " -- s0me be of laughing, as, ha! ha! he !"-Bene Crysorrow wag !"-". And sorrow, wag! cry dick quotes from the “ Accidence.”

hem, when he should groan,' is the reading of the old " — word too LARGE"_“So he uses élarge jests, in

quarto, and of the folios, which may be reconciled to

sense, and therefore ought not to be disturbed. The this play, for licentious-not restrained within due

meaning is clear, though not clearly expressed. And, bounds." -Johnson.

sorrow, wag,' is, and sorrow away! (for which, indeed, Out on the seeming”—The original quarto and it may have been misprinted ;) similar to the exclamafolio have, “ Oat on thee seeming," which Collier alone, tion, 'care, away!' The reading substituted by the of modern editors, retains; understanding it that Claudio commentators has usually beenaddresses Hero as the personification of " seeming," or Cry sorrow, wag! and hem, when he should groanhypocrisy. Pope, followed by many others, altered which has no warrant. Heath's suggestion of— And the phrase to “Out on thy seeming;" which gives a

sorrowing, cry hem, when he should groan,' is the most good sense, and is a probable correction. We have,

plausible emendation."-COLLIER. bowever, preferred that of Knight, most congruous Rowe, Theobald, Hanmer, Tyrwhitt, Warton, Steto the context; and think, with him, that the sense is,

vens, Ritson, and Malone have respectively offered the ** Out on the specious resemblance-I will write against following emendations :—“ And hallow, wag;" “ And it;" that is, against this false representation, along with sorrow wage;" " And sorrow waive;"

“ And sorrow this deceiving portrait

And sorrowing cry;" "And sorry wag;" You seem to me as Dian in her orb, etc.

* And sorrow waggery;" * In sorrow wag.” The * True? O God!”—This is Hero's exclamation on

emendation of Dr. JohnsonJohn's assertion—" these things are true.” It is usually

Cry, sorrow wag! and hem, when he should groanprinted as if Hero answered, “True, O God!" to Ben requires merely the transposition of cry with anda elick's observation, “ This looks not like a nuptial.”

correction of a very common sort of error—and the

sense is then so clear that it has been generally adopted. • - A LIBERAL villain"-i. e. Licentiously free; as, Knight, however, adopts Johnson's first suggestion, in OTHELLO—"Is he not a most profane and liberal which gives the same sense, though harshly expressedcounsellor ?"

And, sorrow wag! cry hem; when he should groan. "Fie, fie! they are not to be nam'd, my lord, Sorrow go by!" is said to be still a common Scotism. Not to be SPOKEN of," etc.

With CANDLE-WASTERS"-By “candle-wasters" is This is the metrical arrangement of the two original probably meant drunkards, or midnight revellers. editions, of which, until Collier, all later editors at

There is, however, a passage in Ben Jonson's “ Cyntempted to make what they thought a more regular thia's Revels,” (act iii. scene 2,) which seems to show metre, by printing

that the epithet was applied, in ridicule, to students Not to be nam'd, my lord, not to be spoke of.

“Spoiled by a whoreson book-worm, a candle-waster." The quarto of 1600 has spoke, the folio (1623) spoken;

Leonato may mean to say, that a misfortune like his is which I mention as indicating the gradual increase of

not to be drugged, or made drunk, by the book-philoso

phy of mere theorists. His whole speech is directed attention to stricter grammatical distinctions.

against comforters of this description. The story that is printed in her blood—“The

"louder than ADVERTISEMENT"-i. e. Than admostory that her blushing discovers to be true.”—Johnson. This explanation has been doubted, but it is confirmed,

nition; than moral instruction. as the Poet's thought, by the Friar's notice of the And made a PUSH"-Pope and others print this, " blushing apparitions on her face."

" make a pish"-i. e. treat with contempt; but“ push" “ — frugal nature's FRAME"-i. e. Ordinance, ar

is the reading of the old copies, that being the old mode rangement, or framing of things; as in this play it is

of spelling. Collier refers to instances in proof of

it, in Beaumont and Fletcher's “ Maids' Revenge;" in said of John

Chapman's “Gentleman Usher;" and repeatedly in His spirits toil in frame of villainies.

Middleton's plays. Boswell would derive the expres* Who SMIRCHED thus"-The foliosubstitutes &meared sion from fencing, and tells us that, “to make a push at for "smirched” in the quarto. “Smirched” is also found any thing is to contend against it, or defy it.” Shakein HAMLET, As You LIKE IT, etc.; but, as Nares (Glos speare's meaning is evident, taking “push" as an intersary) informs us, has hitherto been found in no other jection. author. Our Poet was fond of using it. We have Come, follow me, boy! come, sir boy, come, follow me.* smirched” in this play in the sense of soiled.

“Stevens destroys this most characteristic line-and " — BEAT away those blushes"-We follow Collier in his reading is that of all popular editions—by his old retaining “beat,” the reading of the original quarto,

fashion of metre-mongering. He reads (1600 :) printed in the folio, and all other editions,

Come, follow me, boy ; come, boy, follow me.” bear.



your FOINING fence"-i. e. Thrusting. " — as we do the minstrels"-i. e. As we bid minstrels draw their instruments out of their cases.

" — he knows how to turn his girdle"-Stevens says that the Irish have an expression corresponding to that quoted :—“If he is angry, let him tie up his brogues.” He snpposes both phrases merely to mean, that the angry man should employ himself till be is in a better humour. Instances are quoted to show that it was a common expression of defiance. Mr. Holt White plausibly accounts for the origin of the term, by saying that the buckle was usually worn in front of the belt; but, in wrestling, it was turned behind, in order to give the adversary a fairer grasp at the girdle.

" — Shall I not find a woodcock too"- A jesting allusion to the supposed fact that the woodcock has no brains, and is therefore easily caught; alluding to the success of the plot against Benedick. The joke is common in old plays.

But, soft you; let me be"-Most modern editions read, “let be," in opposition to the older, which have, “let me be;" meaning merely “ let me alone." Let be is, however, good old colloquial English for“ Let things be as they are."

" — INCENSED me to slander"-i. e. Incited me. The word is used in the same sense in RICHARD III. and HENRY VIII."-M. Mason.

Art thou the slave”—The folio repeats thou—“Art thou, thou, the slave ?" which Knight retains, as expressive of passion. It may be right, but it rather seems an accidental repetition, such as often occurs. The quarto reading is as in our text, and the metre

[ocr errors]

agrees with it.

Hang her an epitaph upon her tomb''-It was the custom to attach, upon the tomb of celebrated persons, a written inscription, either in prose or verse, generally in praise of the deceased. (See Bayle, in “Aretin, [Pierre,"] note H.)

And she alone is heir to both of us”—This appears to be a lapse of memory in the author, as mention is made, in act i. scene 2, of a son of Antonio.

" — WAS PACKED in all this wrong"— The old copies have packt, which Collier prints pact, and explains bargain, or contract; Margaret, one party to the pact, being spoken of as the contract itself. We read, with all the other editors, “packed,” in the sense retained in speaking of a “packed jury," combined, an accomplice, a sense common in SHAKESPEARE; as, “Were he not pack'd with her," (Comedy of ERRORS ;) “There's packing,” etc., (Taming OY THE SHREW.) Bacon uses it in the same way.

God save the foundation"—This was a customary old phrase with those who received alms at the gates of religious houses.

- this Lewd fellow”—“Here ‘lewd' has not the common meaning, nor can it be used in the more uncommon sense of ignorant; but rather means knavish, ungracious, naughty, which are the synonymes used with it in explaining the Latin pravus, in dictionaries of the sixteenth century."-SINGER.

SCENE II. "- I give thee the bucklers"—To "give the bucklers" was to yield the victory; by which an enemy obtained his adversary's shield, and retained his own. The phrase was proverbial.

Horo pitiful I deserve"-The beginning of an old ballad by William Elderton.

An old, an old instance"-The words “an old" are repeated in the quarto, as well as in the folios, for greater emphasis.


" - Yonder's Old coil at home" -"Old" is the common ancient augmentative: old coil” means great confusion.

“ — in GUERDON of her wrongs"-"Guerdon," reward.

virgin knightDiana's knight, or 'virgin knight,' was the common poetical appellation of virgins in Shakespeare's time. So, in the Two Noble Kinsmen,' (1634:)

O sacred, shadowy, cold, and constant queen,
- who to thy female knights, etc."

MALONE, HEAVENLY, HEAVENLY"—We have here, with Knight, followed the reading of the folios, in preference to the quarto, which has—Heavily, hearily." To utter is here to put outto eject. Death is expelled “ heavenly"-by the power of heaven. The passage has evidently reference to the sublime verse in “Corin. thians." Ad the other editors have read, “Heavily, heavily," and understand, with Boswell, “ till death be spoken of," or, with Stevens, “till songs of death be uttered;" and then heavily would be appropriate. The folio reading seems to me more poetical and probable, and the sense at least as clear.

This same is she”—The old copies give this speech to Leonato; but, since Theobald, it has been arbitrarily assigned to Antonio.

“Why, no"-"Stevens rejects the "why,' upon the old principle of its being injurious to metre.' When Benedick, in the same way, replies to the question of Beatrice

Do not you love me? the Poet throws a spirit and variety into the answer, by making it,

Troth, no; no more than reason. Stevens cuts out the “troth:” the metre (says he) is overloaded. It would matter little what Stevens did with his own edition, but he has furnished the text of every popular edition of Shakespeare extant; and for this reason we feel it a duty perpetually to protest against his corruptions of the real text."-Knight.

- get thee a wife: there is no staff more reverend than one tipped with horn"-The “staff" is marriage. Benedick supposes it to be a welcome and respectable support to Bo giddy a thing as man," although he cannot avoid a final flout at the “horn," which forms the handle of the staff, and an emblem of the destiny which he has all along attributed to married men. Wit ness the “recheat in the forehead," etc. To this day, it is common to see old-fashioned sticks, or canes, surmounted with horn handles. Stevens and Malone will have it, that the allusion is to the baston, or “staff tipped with horn,” used by combatants in the wager of battle; but we are not informed how the passage in the text is at all explained by the use of these weapons.

Coleridge has selected this comedy as affording a special example of a pervading characteristic of Shakespeare's dramas, which distinguishes them from those of all other dramatic poets. It is that of the independence of dramatic interest without the plot:

“The interest (says he) in the plot is on account of the characters, not vice versá, as in almost all other writers; the plot is a mere canvass, and no more. Hence arises the true justification of the same stratagem being used in regard to Benedick and Beatrice—the vanity in each being alike. Take away from Much ADO ABOUT Nothing all that which is not indispensable to the plot, either as having little to do with it, or, at best, like Dog. berry and his comrades, forced into the service, when any other less ingeniously absurd watchmen and nightconstables would have answered the mere necessities of the action; take away Benedick, Beatrice, Dogberry, and the reaction of the former on the character of Hero and what will remain? In other writers the main agent of the plot is always the prominent character; in

Sunkespeare it is so, or is pul so, as the character is in itself calculated, or not calculated, to form the plot. Don John is the main-spring of the plot of this play ; but he is merely shown, and then withdrawn.”

Among the most original and ingenious of the Shakespeare critics of Germany is Dr. Ulrici, whose “Essay on Shakespeare's Dramatic Wit, and his Relation to Cal. deron and Goethe" is founded mainly on the idea that Shakespeare's peculiar and essential difference from other dramatic poets consists in a view of human life suggested or unfolded by Christian revelation, in opposition to one derived from mythological paganism or natural reason. The reader will readily acknowledge a share of truth in this proposition; while, in the bold and unqualified manner in which it is announced, and the extent to which it is carried, it has much the air of paradoxical hypothesis. We are indebted to an excellent paper on Shakespearian literature, in the “ Edinburgh Review," for 1840, for the following abridgment of Ulrici's analysis of the comedy before us :

“Ulrici's theory, as to the leading idea of Much Ado ABOUT Nothing, is exceedingly ingenious. He considers the play as a representation of the contrast and contradiction between life, in its real essence, and the aspect which it presents to those who are engaged in its struggle. And this contradiction, he tells us, is set forth in an acted commentary on the title of the drama-a series of incidents which, in themselves neither real nor strange, nor important, are regarded by the actors as being all these things. The war at the opening, it is said, begins without reason and ends without result; Don Pedro seems to woo Hero for himself, while he gains her for his friend; Benedick and Beatrice, after carrying on a merry campaign of words without real enmity, are entrapped into marriage without real love; the leading story rests in a seeming faithlessness, and its results are a seeming death and funeral, a challenge which produces no fighting, and a marriage in which the bride is a pretender; and the weakness and shadowiness of human wishes and plans are exposed with yet more cutting irony in the means that bring about the fortunate catastrophe—an accident in which the unwitting agents, headed by Dogberry, the very representative of the idea of the piece, are the lowest and most stupid characters of the whole group. The Poet's readers may hesitate in following his speculative critic the whole way in this journey to the temple of abstract truth; but there can be no reasonable doubt that, for a long part of it, he has followed the right track. And it is interesting to trace how that great rule of the Poet, which Coleridge has set down as characteristic of himhis general avoidance of surprises—is here, as elsewhere, made subservient to the immediate purpose."

Campbell's remarks on this play are written in a more worldly spirit, and in a splenetic humour :

"I fully agree with the admirers of this play in their opinion as to the most of its striking merits. The scene of the young and guiltless heroine struck speechless by the accusation of her lover, and swooning at the foot of the nuptial altar, is deeply touching. There is eloquence in her speechlessness, and we may apply the words, Ipsa silentia terrent,' amidst the silence of those who have not the ready courage to defend her, while her father's harsh and hasty belief of her guilt crowns the pathos of her desolation. At this crisis, the exclamation of Beatrice, the sole believer in her innocence, ‘O! on my soul, my cousin is belied,' is a relieving and glad voice in the wilderness, which almost reconciles me to Beatrice's otherwise disagreeable character. I agree also that Shakespeare has, all the while, afforded the means of softening our dismayed compassion for Hero, by our previous knowledge of her innocence, and we are sure that she shall be exculpated. Yet who, but Shakespeare, could dry our tears of interest for Hero, by so laughable an agent as the immortal Dogberry ? I beg pardon for having allowed that Falstaff makes us forget all the other comic creations of our Poet. How

could I have overlooked you, my Launce, and my Launce's dog, and my Dogberry? To say that Falstaff makes us forget Dogberry is, as Dogberry himself would say, most tolerable and not to be endured. And yet Shakespeare, after pouncing on this ridiculous prey, springs up, forthwith, to high dramatic effect, in making Claudio, who had mistakenly accused Hero, so repentant as to consentingly marry another woman, her supposed cousin, under a veil, which, when it is lifted, displays his own vindicated bride, who had been supposed to have died of grief, but who is now restored to him, like another Alcestis, from the grave.

At the same time, if Shakespeare were looking over iny shoulder, I could not disguise some objections to this comedy, which involuntarily strike me as debarring it from ranking among our Poet's most enchanting dramas. I am on the whole, I trust, a liberal on the score of dramatic probability. Our fancy and its faith are no niggards in believing whatsoever they may be delighted withal; but, if I may use a vulgar saying, 'a willing horse should not be ridden too hard.' Our fan- . ciful faith is misused when it is spurred and impelled to believe that Don John, without one particle of love for Hero, but ont of mere personal spite to Claudio, should contrive the infernal treachery which made the latter assuredly jealous. Moreover, during one half of the play, we have a disagreeable female character in that of Beatrice. Her portrait, I may be told, is deeply drawn, and minutely finished. It is; and so is that of Benedick, who is entirely her counterpart, except that he is less disagreeable. But the best-drawn portraits by the finest masters may be admirable in execution, though unpleasant to contemplate, and Beatrice's portrait is in this category. She is a tartar, by Shakespeare's own showing, and, if a natural woman, is not a pleasing representative of the sex. In befriending Hero, she almost reconciles us to her, but not entirely; for a good heart, that shows itself only on extraordinary occasions, is no sufficient atonement for a bad temper, which Beatrice evidently shows. The marriage of the marriage-hating Benedick and the furiously anti-nuptial Beatrice is brought about by a trick. Their friends contrive to deceive them into a belief that they love each other, and partly by vanity-partly by a mutual affection, which had been disguised under the bickerings of their wit-they have their

hands joined, and the consolations of religion are administered, by the priest who marries them, to the unhappy sufferers.

“Mrs. Jameson, in her characters of Shakespeare, concludes with hoping that Beatrice will live happy with Benedick ; but I have no such hope; and my final anticipation in reading the play is the certainty that Beatrice will provoke her Benedick to give her much and just conjugal castigation. She is an odious woman. Her own cousin says of her

Disdain and scorn ride sparkling in her eyes,
Misprizing what they look on-and her wit
Values itself so highly, that to her

She cannot love,
Nor take no shape nor project of affection,

She is so self-endeared. “I once knew such a pair; the lady was a perfect Beatrice; she railed hypocritically at wedlock before her marriage, and with bitter sincerity after it. She and her Benedick now live apart, but with entire reciprocity of sentiments, each devoutly wishing that the other may soon pass into a better world. Beatrice is not to be compared, but contrasted with Rosalind, who is equally witty; but the sparkling sayings of Rosalind are like gems upon her head at court, and like dew. drops on her bright hair in the woodland forest."

We extract this last criticism, partly in deference to Campbell's general exquisite taste and reverent appreciation of Shakespeare's genius, and partly as an example of the manner in which accidental personal associations influence taste and opinion. The critical poet seems to have unhappily suffered under the caprices or insolence of some accomplished but fantastical female

All matters else seem weak

wit, whose resemblance he thinks he recognizes in Bea such, we doubt not, was the result shown in the married trice; and then vents the offences of the belle of Edin life of Beatrice. burgh, or London, upon her prototype of Messina, or The objection to the character of the Bastard John goes more probably of the court of Queen Elizabeth. Those | deeper into the sources of human action. It denies who, without encountering any such unlucky cause of the truth of such a character, for reasons which would personal prejudice, have looked long enough upon the apply also to that of lago. I wish, for the honour of rapidly passing generations of wits and beauties in the human nature, that the objection were well founded; gay world to have noted their characters as they first and that the Poet had here drawn an unreal characappeared, and subsequently developed themselves in ter, acting from motives such as never influence conduct after life, will pronounce a very different judgment. in real life. But, unhappily, it is not so. Experience Beatrice's faults are such as ordinarily spring from the shows too many instances of the infliction of causeless consciousness of talent and beauty, accompanied with the and bitter injury, without any adequate personal motive, high spirits of youth and health, and the play of a lively of passion or of interest, to suffer us to doubt the truth fancy. Her brilliant intellectual qualities are associated or probability of John, or Iago. Self-generated envy with strong and generous feelings, high confidence in and hatred, the natural “strong antipathy of bad to female truth and virtue, warm attachment to her friends, good," the Satanic pleasure of making others feel pangs and quick, undisguised indignation at wrong and injus- similar to those which guilt has made familiar to their tice. There is the rich material, which the experience | own breasts, the very gratification derived from the ex. and the sorrows of maturer life, the affection and the ercise of malignant power, - every one of these has duties of the wife and the mother, can gradually shape prompted many deeds and plots, surpassing in guilt the into the noblest forms of matronly excellence; and revenge or hatred of ambition, rivalry, or jealousy.

« PreviousContinue »