Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the LivingThis is a bold, brilliant, provocative and puzzling work. It demands a radical shift in standpoint, an almost paradoxical posture in which living systems are described in terms of what lies outside the domain of descriptions. Professor Humberto Maturana, with his colleague Francisco Varela, have undertaken the construction of a systematic theoretical biology which attempts to define living systems not as they are objects of observation and description, nor even as in teracting systems, but as self-contained unities whose only reference is to them selves. Thus, the standpoint of description of such unities from the 'outside', i. e. , by an observer, already seems to violate the fundamental requirement which Maturana and Varela posit for the characterization of such system- namely, that they are autonomous, self-referring and self-constructing closed systems - in short, autopoietic systems in their terms. Yet, on the basis of such a conceptual method, and such a theory of living systems, Maturana goes on to define cognition as a biological phenomenon; as, in effect, the very nature of all living systems. And on this basis, to generate the very domains of interac tion among such systems which constitute language, description and thinking. |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
| 5 | |
| 7 | |
| 15 | |
| 41 | |
| 48 | |
| 63 | |
Introduction | 73 |
DISPENSABILITY OF TELEONOMY | 85 |
Embodiments of Autopoiesis | 88 |
Diversity of Autopoiesis | 96 |
Presence of Autopoiesis | 112 |
The Nervous System | 124 |
Glossary | 135 |
INDEX OF NAMES | 141 |
Other editions - View all
Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living H.R. Maturana,F. J. Varela Limited preview - 2012 |
Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living H.R. Maturana,F. J. Varela Limited preview - 1991 |
Common terms and phrases
Accordingly afferent allopoietic ambience anatomical apparent arise autopoietic machine autopoietic organization autopoietic space autopoietic system autopoietic unities basic circularity biological phenomenology characterize circular organization classes cognitive domain composite unity concatenation concrete conduct configuration coupling defined deformations describe determined domain of descriptions domain of discourse domain of interactions effector areas effector surfaces elements embodied environment evolution explain first Francisco Varela given hence historical network homeostatic identity implies independent entities individual influences internal linguistic domain linguistic interactions living organization living systems maintain constant maintenance manner mode necessarily nerve cells nervous system neuronal activity neuronal network neuropils niche notion observer ontogeny operation organization of living orienting behavior orienting interactions participation particular perturbations phenomena phenomenological domain physical autopoietic physical space poietic possible properties receptor surfaces recursive reference relations of production relative activity representations result self-referring self-reproduction significance species specification specify structure subordinated takes place teleonomy tion transfer functions transformation unit of interactions valid
Popular passages
Page 135 - An autopoietic machine is a machine organized (defined as a unity) as a network of processes of production (transformation and destruction) of components that produces the components...
Page 82 - ... organized in such a way that any 'interference' with their operation outside their domain of compensations will result in their disintegration. Maturana and Varela reach two principal conclusions concerning the machine: firstly, if living systems are machines (physical autopoietic machines), which transform matter into themselves in a manner such that the product of their operation is always their own organization, then the converse is also true: if it is autopoietic, then a physical system is...
Page 22 - This basic uniformity of organization can best be expressed by saying: all that is accessible to the nervous system at any point are states of relative activity holding between nerve cells, and all that to which any given state of relative activity can give rise are further states of relative activity in other nerve cells by forming those states of relative activity to which they respond.
Page 13 - Living systems are cognitive systems, and living, as a process, is a process of cognition. This statement is valid for all organisms, with and without a nervous system.
Page 30 - However, when it is recognized that language is connotative and not denotative, and that its function is to orient the orientee within his cognitive domain without regard for the cognitive domain of the orienter, it becomes apparent that there is no transmission of information through language.
Page 13 - A cognitive system is a system whose organization defines a domain of interactions in which it can act with relevance to the maintenance of itself, and the process of cognition is the actual (inductive) acting or behaving in this domain.
Page 9 - Living systems are units of interactions; they exist in an environment. From a purely biological point of view they cannot be understood independently of the part of the environment with which they interact, the niche; nor can the niche be defined independently of the living system that occupies...
Page xv - He arrived at his theory, he explains in the introduction, by deciding to treat "the activity of the nervous system as determined by the nervous system itself, and not by the external world; thus the external world would have only a triggering role in the release of the internally-determined activity of the nervous system
Page 41 - The linguistic domain as a domain of orienting behavior requires at least two interacting organisms with comparable domains of interactions, so that a cooperative system of consensual interactions may be developed in which the emerging conduct of the two organisms is relevant for both. . . . The central feature of human existence is its occurrence in a linguistic cognitive domain. This domain is constitutively social
Page 135 - ... constitute it (the machine) as a concrete unity in the space in which they exist by specifying the topological domain of its realization as such a network.
