HomicideThe human race spends a disproportionate amount of attention, money, and expertise in solving, trying, and reporting homicides, as compared to other social problems. The public avidly consumes accounts of real-life homicide cases, and murder fiction is more popular still. Nevertheless, we have only the most rudimentary scientific understanding of who is likely to kill whom and why. Martin Daly and Margo Wilson apply contemporary evolutionary theory to analysis of human motives and perceptions of self-interest, considering where and why individual interests conflict, using well-documented murder cases. This book attempts to understand normal social motives in murder as products of the process of evolution by natural selection. They note that the implications for psychology are many and profound, touching on such matters as parental affection and rejection, sibling rivalry, sex differences in interests and inclinations, social comparison and achievement motives, our sense of justice, lifespan developmental changes in attitudes, and the phenomenology of the self. This is the first volume of its kind to analyze homicides in the light of a theory of interpersonal conflict. Before this study, no one had compared an observed distribution of victim-killer relationships to "expected" distribution, nor asked about the patterns of killer-victim age disparities in familial killings. This evolutionary psychological approach affords a deeper view and understanding of homicidal violence. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 57
... Chapters 3 and 4 , that this theory of maternal motivation , inspired by evolution- ary theory , is correct . Several critics of " sociobiology " have complained that the application of selection thinking to the explanation of behavior ...
... chapters , we shall explore some implications of the above theory of conflict and apply it to data on homicide . Here , a brief example will illustrate the possible uses of the theory . Selection thinking suggests that genetic ...
... Chapter 9 , the data match the latter hypothesis better than the former . There is nothing embarrassing or " unscientific " about the fact that imaginations informed by evolutionary theory can generate alternative scenarios . Selection ...
... chapters . ) So if our aim is to understand the behavior of killers , not prosecutors , our offender populations will have to include those identified by the police but not convicted . Such a criterion must of course admit some number ...
... chapter of its own , and many of the remainder were also relatives by marriage . Blood kin accounted for only 25.2 % of the 127 " relatives " or 6.3 % of the total of 508 homicides . Are these Detroit data typical of American homicide ...
Contents
10 | |
17 | |
Kinship and collaborative homicide revisited | 34 |
Femaleselective infanticide | 53 |
II Parental Homicide in the Modern | 61 |
Stepparents and offspring | 90 |
Oedipal conflict and the primal parricide | 107 |
Conflict over what? | 114 |
7 Why Men and Not Women? | 137 |
8 The Logic of SameSex Conflict | 163 |
9 Till Death Us Do Part | 187 |
10 Retaliation and Revenge | 221 |
11 Calling the Killers to Account | 253 |
12 On Cultural Variation | 275 |
Summary and Concluding Comments | 293 |
References | 299 |
6 | 120 |
Index | 323 |