 | Richard M. Steuer - Law - 1983 - 84 pages
...explained that four elements arc necessary to establish liability under the essential facilities doctrine: (1) control of the essential facility by a monopolist;...and (4) the feasibility of providing the facility. Id. Applying the test, the court found that AT&T's refusal to interconnect constituted an act of monopolization... | |
 | Thomas V. Vakerics - 1132 pages
...factors must be shown to exist: (1) control of the essential facility by a monopolist; (2) the inability to duplicate the essential facility; (3) the denial...competitor; and, (4) the feasibility of providing the facility.89 In Verizon Communications,90 The Supreme Court refused to find Verizon's alleged insufficient... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Commerce, Transportation, and Tourism - Antitrust law - 1986 - 372 pages
...4 Tel. Co., 708 F.2d lOal, 11321133, (7th Cir. 1983), cert, denied, 464 US 891 (1983), as follows: (1) control of the essential facility by a monopolist;...and (4) the feasibility of providing the facility. See also Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc., 570 F.2d 982, 99293 (DC Cir. 1977), cert, denied, ~436 US 956... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - Antitrust law - 1986 - 714 pages
...tt Tel. Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 11321133, (7th Cir. 1983), cert, denied, 464 US 891 (1983), as follows: (1) control of the essential facility by a monopolist;...reasonably to duplicate the essential facility; (3) (FOOTNOTE CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) tailored in a careful and specific fashion in recognition of the... | |
 | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - Business & Economics - 1996 - 103 pages
...monopolist; (ii) a competitor's inability practically or reasonably to duplicate the essential facility; (Hi) the denial of the use of the facility to a competitor; and (iv) the feasibility of providing the facility.™ These conditions do not characterize the circumstances... | |
 | David Gabel, David F. Weiman - Business & Economics - 1998 - 258 pages
...forward a four-part test for establishing liability for essential facility claims: "(1) control of an essential facility by a monopolist; (2) a competitor's...competitor; and (4) the feasibility of providing the facility."56 The court's rationale for applying the doctrine to single-firm conduct was that "a monopolist's... | |
| |
The case law sets forth four elements necessary to establish liability under the essential facilities doctrine: (1) control of the essential facility by a monopolist; (2) a competitor's inability practically or reasonably to duplicate the essential facility;... 
