Page images
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed]

Names of the Phrenological Organs REFERRING TO THE FIGURES „DiCuring the

THEIR

RELATIE POSITIO.V.S.

[ocr errors][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

brutvumilia 351 4 timpil?x77 2 Pulopromtienes 121 1 lm i aprobatum 265 23 Form

18:35 wusulit 3 tuntratimes 14 12

2?21 SW 27 13 Benarlimir 2022 Wahl 5 Antti nas 157 14 Vmatun 274 % kurin) 6 Destruimus 105 Firmness

285 27 Lahti + llarateness 184 16 ansiantinusnos?88 Number

120 7 Sareness 1

304 24 inder & Sustinus

309. Eventuali 9 Constructiveness 27 | Balita

32
Time

17
Inasemained .131.? Tuna
2° litor.birihiness 31:33 languar
0 Imutahon

2

SYSTEM

OF

PHRENOLOGY.

BY

GEORGE COMBE,

LATE PRESIDENT OF THE PHRENOLOGICAL SOCIETY.

THIRD EDITION.

Res non verba quæso.

JOHN ANDERSON JUN. EDINBURGH,

55. NORTH BRIDGE STREET,

AND LONGMAN & CO. LONDON.

MDCCCXXX.

[ocr errors][merged small]

PREFACE.

The following are the circumstances which led to the publication of the present Work.

My first information concerning the System of Drs Gall and SPURZHEIM, was derived from No. 49. of the Edinburgh Review. Led away by the boldness of that piece of criticism, I regarded their doctrines as contemptibly absurd, and their authors as the most disingenuous of men. In 1816, however, shortly after the publication of the Review, my friend Mr BROWNLEE invited me to attend a private dissection of a recent brain, to be performed in his house by Dr SPURZHEIM. The subject was not altogether new, as I had previously attended a Course of Demonstrative Lectures on Anatomy by Dr BARCLAY, Dr SPURZHEIM exhibited the structure of the brain to all present, among whom were several gentlemen of the medical profession, and contrasted it with the bold averments of the Reviewer. The result was a complete conviction in the minds of the observers, that the assertions of the Reviewer were refuted by physical demonstration.

« PreviousContinue »