The Reformed Objection to Natural Theology

Front Cover
Routledge, Feb 24, 2016 - Religion - 250 pages
Michael Sudduth examines three prominent objections to natural theology that have emerged in the Reformed streams of the Protestant theological tradition: objections from the immediacy of our knowledge of God, the noetic effects of sin, and the logic of theistic arguments. Distinguishing between the project of natural theology and particular models of natural theology, Sudduth argues that none of the main Reformed objections is successful as an objection to the project of natural theology itself. One particular model of natural theology - the dogmatic model - is best suited to handle Reformed concerns over natural theology. According to this model, rational theistic arguments represent the reflective reconstruction of the natural knowledge of God by the Christian in the context of dogmatic theology. Informed by both contemporary religious epistemology and the history of Protestant philosophical theology, Sudduth’'s examination illuminates the complex nature of the project of natural theology and its place in the Reformed tradition.
 

Contents

Preface
The Emergence and Evolution of the Reformed
Understanding the Reformed Objection to Natural Theology
KNOWLEDGE OF
Immediacy and Reformed Models of Natural Theology
Natural Theology and the Noetic Effects of
The Noetic Effects of Sin and Contemporary Epistemology
The Dogmatic Model of Natural Theology
The Logic of Theistic Arguments
God of the Philosophers
The Robust Theistic Descriptivist Objection Evaluated

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2016)

Michael Sudduth is Lecturer in Philosophy at San Francisco State University, USA.

Bibliographic information