Legalizing Misandry: From Public Shame to Systemic Discrimination Against Men
Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young believe that this reveals a shift in the United States and Canada to a worldview based on ideological feminism, which presents all issues from the point of view of women and, in the process, explicitly or implicitly attacks men as a class. They argue that ideological feminism is silently reshaping law, public policy, education, and journalism.
What people are saying - Write a review
Review: Legalizing Misandry: From Public Shame to Systemic Discrimination against MenUser Review - Goodreads
Thoroughly enlightening and scary, further evidence that equality, in the realist terms, is all about who can be more vile to others,dogmatically;rather than building up individuals, as is professed ... Read full review
Other editions - View all
abuse academic According accused actually affirmative action American Andrea Dworkin argued battered behaviour believe Bouchard boys Canadian Catharine MacKinnon challenge chapter child support claim considered context Court crime criminal custody debate defined discrimination discuss divorce domestic violence Dworkin equality evidence evil fact Farrell fathers federal female Gender groups gynocentrism human rights ideological feminism ideological feminists interest involved Justice least legislation LÚpine MacKinnon male Marc LÚpine marriage masculine means men’s ment merely misandry misogyny Montreal Gazette moral moreover mothers National Neidig parents Patai pay equity policies popular culture porn pornography problem programs promote prostitution protect rape reason refers response result rhetoric romance novels sexual assault sexual harassment social society Spreading Misandry statistics Status of Women theory thing tion United University victims violence against women visited witch hunts woman women’s studies words