The imagination of Southey is marked by similar traits; there is no flash, no scintillation about it, but a steady light as of day itself. As specimens of his best manner, I would mention the last stage of Thalaba's journey to the Domdaniel Caves, and, in the “Curse of Kehama,” the sea-palace of Baly, “ The Glen. doveer,” and “ The Ship of Heaven.” As Southey's poems are not very generally read, I will extract the two latter: “THE SHIP OF HEAVEN. On either side, in wavy tide, Around the living bark enamored play, “That bark in shape was like the furrowed shell Wherein the sea-nymphs to their parent king, The sail, from end to end displayed, An angel's head with visual eye, Nor aid of wing, nor foot nor fin, Disturbs the surface of the silver stream, Southey professes to have borrowed the description of the Glendoveer from an old and forgotten book. He has given the prose extract in a note to the “Curse of Kehama,” and I think no one can compare the two without feeling that the true alchymy has been at work there. His poetry is a new and life-giving element to the very striking thoughts he borrowed. Charcoal and diamonds are not more unlike in their effect upon the observer, "THE GLENDOVEER. “Of human form divine was he, Even such as that divinest form shall be When no infirmity, The wings of eagle or of cherubim Had seemed unworthy him; Imperial majesty: The permeating light Now bright as when the rose, From Douro's generous vine, The orient, like a shrine, And heralding his way Proclaims the presence of the power divine Thus glorious were the wings Nor these alone Spreading like fibres from their parent stem; Or as the chaster hue The buoyant air, and now in gentler flight On motionless wing expanded, shoot along." All Southey's works are instinct, and replete with the experi. ences of piety, from that fine picture of natural religion, Joan of Arc's confession of faith, to that as noble sermon as ever was preached upon Christianity, the penitence of Roderic the Goth. This last is the most original and elevated in its design of all Southey's poems. In “ Thalaba” and “ Joan of Arc,” he had illustrated the power of faith ; in “Madoc” contrasted religion under a pure and simple form with the hydra ugliness of superstition. In “ Kehama” he has exhibited virtue struggling against the most dreadful inflictions with heavenly fortitude, and made manifest to us the angel-guards who love to wait on innocence and goodness. But in Roderic the design has even a higher scope, is more difficult of execution ; and, so far as I know, unique. The temptations which beset a single soul have been a frequent subject, and one sure of sympathy if treated with any power. Breathlessly we watch the conflict, with heartfelt anguish mourn defeat, or with heart-expanding triumph hail a conquest. But, where there has been defeat, to lead us back with the fallen one through the thorny and desolate paths of repent. ance to purification, to win not only our pity, but our sympathy, for one crushed and degraded by his own sin ; and finally, through his faithful though secret efforts to redeem the past, secure to him, justly blighted and world-forsaken as he is, not only our sorrowing love, but our respect ;—this Southey alone has done, perhaps alone could do. As a scene of unrivalled ex. cellence, both for its meaning and its manner, I would mention that of Florinda's return with “ Roderic,” (who is disguised as a monk, and whom she does not know,) to her father ; when after such a strife of heart-rending words and heart-broken tears, they, exhausted, seat themselves on the bank of the little stream, and watch together the quiet moon. Never has Christianity spoken in accents of more penetrating tenderness since the promise was given to them that be weary and heavy-laden. Of Coleridge I shall say little. Few minds are capable of fathoming his by their own sympathies, and he has left us no adequate manifestation of himself as a poet by which to judge him. For his dramas, I consider them complete failures, and more like visions than dramas. For a metaphysical mind like his to attempt that walk, was scarcely more judicious than it would be for a blind man to essay painting the bay of Naples. Many of his smaller pieces are perfect in their way, indeed no writer could excel him in depicting a single mood of mind, as Dejection, for instance. Could Shakspeare have surpassed these lines ? “A grief without a pang, void, dark, and Jrear A stifled, drowsy, unimpassioned grief, O Lady, in this wan and heartless mood, Have I been gazing on the western sky And still I gaze—and with how blank an eye! Those stars, that glide behind them or between, I see them all, so excellently fair, My genial spirits fail, And what can these avail It were a vain endeavour, Though I should gaze for ever Give Coleridge a canvass, and he will paint a single mood as if his colors were made of the mind's own atoms. Here he is very unlike Southey. There is nothing of the spectator about Coleridge ; he is all life; not impassioned, not vehement, but searching, intellectual life, which seems “ listening through the frame” to its own pulses. I have little more to say at present except to express a great, though not fanatical veneration for Coleridge, and a conviction that the benefits conferred by him on this and future ages are as yet incalculable. Every mind will praise him for what it can best receive from him. He can suggest to an infinite degree; he can inform, but he cannot reform and renovate. To the unprepared he is nothing, to the prepared, every thing. Of him may be said what he said of Nature, “We receive but what we give, In kind though not in measure.” I was once requested, by a very sensible and excellent person, age to explain what is meant by “ Christabel” and “ The An. cient Mariner.” I declined the task. I had not then seen Cole. ridge's answer to a question of similar tenor from Mrs. Barbauld, |