Pluralism by Default: Weak Autocrats and the Rise of Competitive Politics"Focusing on regime trajectories across the former Soviet Union, Pluralism by Default posits that political competition in "new democracies" has often been grounded less in well-designed institutions, democratic leaders, or emerging civil society and more in the failure of authoritarianism. Lucan Way contends that pluralism has persisted in many cases because autocrats lack the organization, authority, or coordination to steal elections, impose censorship, repress opposition, or keep allies in line. Attention to the dynamics of this "pluralism by default" reveals a largely unrecognized contradiction in the transition process: the same factors that facilitate democratic and semi-democratic political competition may also thwart the development of stable, well-functioning democratic institutions. National divisions or weak states and parties--typically seen as impediments to democracy--can also stymie efforts to crack down on political opposition and concentrate control. Way demonstrates that the features that have made Ukraine the most democratic country in the former Soviet Union also contributed to the country's extreme dysfunction and descent into war in 2014"-- |
Contents
1 Introduction | 1 |
2 Perestroika and the Origins of PostSoviet Pluralism by Default | 32 |
3 Pluralism by Default in Ukraine | 43 |
4 Pluralism by Default in Moldova | 92 |
5 Authoritarian Consolidation in Belarus | 115 |
6 Consolidated and Unconsolidated Authoritarianism in the Former Soviet Union | 143 |
7 Conclusion | 166 |
Coding Rules for Main Variables | 181 |
National Identity Organizational Capacity and Regime Outcomes among PostSoviet Incumbents | 190 |
Notes | 195 |
231 | |
251 | |
Other editions - View all
Pluralism by Default: Weak Autocrats and the Rise of Competitive Politics Lucan Way Limited preview - 2015 |
Common terms and phrases
activists allies Armenia authoritarian authoritarian rule authoritarian weakness autocrats Azerbaijan Beissinger Belarus Belarusian bolstered central civil society coalition coercive capacity cohesion Communist Party consolidation contrast countries country’s created democracy democratic deputies early economic control efforts electoral elite Embassy Cable Feduta forces former Soviet Union Freedom House Georgia High split incumbents institutions Interview Karbalevich 2010 Kazakhstan Kebich Kravchuk Kuchma Kuzio Kyiv Kyrgyzstan late leaders legislature Levitsky Low split Lucinschi Lukashenka Med-low Medium Minsk mobilization Moldova Moldova and Ukraine national divisions national identity nationalist nomenklatura officials oligarchs Orange Revolution organizational capacity parliament parliamentary Party of Regions percent pluralism by default polarization political competition post-Soviet president presidential elections prime minister protests Putin regime closure relatively repression ruling party Russia Russophile Score significant Snegur Soviet Union Tajikistan tion Transnistria Turkmenistan turnover Tymoshenko Ukraine Ukraine’s Ukrainian Ukrainska Pravda undermined Uzbekistan vote Western Yanukovych Yeltsin Yushchenko Zerkalo nedeli