III. HENCE We may perceive the juft Foun- SECT. dation of the well-known Maxim in rhetorical Composition, Artis eft celare artem. In every other Art, where the End is Pleafure, Inftruction, or Admiration, the greater Art the Mafter difplays, the more effectually he gains his Purpofe. But where the End is Perfuafion, the Discovery of his Art muft defeat its Force and Defign. For ere he can perfuade, he must seem to apply to his Hearer's Reafon, while, in Fact, he is working on his Imagination and Affections: Now this, once known, muft defeat his Purpose; because nothing can perfuade but what has the Appearance of Truth. HENCE too we may fee where the true Medium lies between the too frequent Ufe, and delicate Avoidance of poetical Images, in Eloquence. Metaphors, Similies, bold Figures, and glowing Expreffions are proper, fo far as they point the Imagination to the main Subject on which the Paffion is to be excited: When they begin to amufe, they grow abfurd. abfurd. And here, by the way, lies the effential Difference between the Epic and Tragic Compofition. For the Epic, tending chiefly to Admiration and Instruction, allows a full Display of Art; But III. SECT. the Tragic, being of the perfuafive Kind, muft only regard and touch upon poetical Images in this fingle View, as they tend to rowze the Paffions of the Soul. MACROBIUS hath collected many elegant Examples of this poetic Elocution from the Eneid: He hath ranged them in Claffes, and pointed out the Fountains whence the great Poet drew his Pathos: And fure, it may with Truth be affirmed, that "the Mafter"ftrokes of that divine Work are rather of "the Tragic, than the Epic Species." THESE Remarks will enable us to difcover the Impropriety of an Opinion commonly held; "that the Reafon why Elo quence had fuch Power, and wrought "fuch Wonders in Athens and Rome, was, "because it had become the general Tafte "and Study of the Times: That confe quently thefe Cities were more fenfible "to its Charms, and therefore more warmly "affected by it." Now, though with regard to pure Poetry or ftrict Argument, where either Pleafure or Truth are the purpofed Ends, this Reasoning might hold; yet, when applied to Eloquence, it seems to Saturnal. 1. iv. paffim. See Mr. Hume's be III. be without Foundation. For where Igno- SECT. rance is predominant, there any Application to the Fancy or the Paffions is most likely to wear the Appearance of Reason, and therefore the most likely to persuade. As Men improve in Knowledge, fuch Application must proportionably lofe its Force, and true Reasoning prevail. Hence it should feem, that they who make the conftituent Principles of Eloquence familiar to their Imagination, muft of all others be beft enabled to feparate Truth from its Appearances, and distinguish between Argument and Colouring. An artful Oration will indeed afford great Pleasure to one who hath applied himself to the Study of Rhetoric: Yet, not fo as that he fhall be perfuaded by it: On the contrary, his Pleasure confifts in a reflex Act of the Understanding; and arifes from the very Circumftance which prevents Perfuafion, a Discovery of the Master's Art. THE true Reason therefore, why Eloquence gained fuch mighty Power in these famed Republics was, "because the Ora"tors addreffed themselves to the People as "their fudges." Here the Art triumphed: for it had not Reafon to inftruct, but Imagination and Paffion to controul. According ly III. SECT. ly we find, that no fooner was the popular Excudent alii fpirantia mollius æra — Tu regere imperio populos, Romane, me mento: Hæ tibi erunt artes'. With the fame Penetration he lays the r Eneïd. 1. vi. Ac 1 Ac veluti magno in populo cum fæpe coorta eft SE CT. Jamque faces et faxa volant; furor arma mi niftrat ; Tum pietate gravem ac meritis fi forte virum quem Confpexere, filent, arretifque auribus aftant: 'Tis true, we have a fuppofed Inftance on read the Oration, we ftand amazed at its Y • En. l. i. * Pro Ligario. ▾ Cafaubon, Sir III. W. Temple, Mr. Hume, &c. know |