« PreviousContinue »
the Publication till now ; if perchance fome few may even now be at leisure to peruse them. .
I need not acquaint the Reader, that in the whole Controversy concerning the Everblessed Trinity, the principal Point, and that which has been the most largely and warmly debated, is the Divinity of the Son or Second Perfor. Upon this therefore I have Spent the greater Part of my Discourse, wherein I have carefully answered all Objections, and particylarly the Learned will be perhaps not displeased with the Pains I have taken in establishing, what our Greatest Divines do generally either suppose or affert, tho they have been over. fparing in the Proof of it; I mean the Quiescence of the WORD during our Savior’s Ministry.
Of what Consequence this Notion is, 'tis impobssile for the most negligent not to perceive. It enables us 'clearly to account for our Savior's not knowing the Day, of Judgment, which has hitherto been esteemed the great Difficulty : and it gives such a Turn to the whole Dispute, that I can't but wonder, how those Divines, who have been necessitated to shelter themselves under it, and have therefore so frequently suggested and proposed it ; should not discern, or at least lo imperfectly display, that Evidence of it, which the Holy Scriptures afford us. I dare affirm, that whosoever impartially considers what I have of fered (and truly I thought my self obliged to enlarge pretty freely on a Matter of such Importance, especially when it has been too much neglected by others) will readily embrace a Truth, which is so
manifestly useful in the Demonftration of our bleffed Lord's Divinity... ...
There is one thing, which in the Opinion of fome Persons) may posibly need an Ayology. I have taken the Liberty of maintaining the Preexistence of our Savior's Human Soul; not because I am in the least inclined to favor the Preexistence of other Souls ; but because the Holy Scriptures, I bumbly conceive, do warrant that Position. I promise my self, that the Reader will candidly weigh what I have advanced concerning that Tenet. I assure him, I have no particular Fondness for it, notwithstanding it has been, and fill is, maintained by Great Divines. I can't but think it the most rational Way of interpreting diverse Texts of Scripture : but if any one will bew. me, how to interpret those Text's without admitting that Doctrine, I shall readily become his Convert." This I am sure of, the Consubstantial Divinity of our Lord is so plainly taught in Scripture, that I would admit any Hypothesis, provided it were barely possible, rather thin deny iti and if those Texts can be explained fo, as not to injure that great Truth ; the Author of fucb Ex lica ion Mall find me, not his Advey fary, but truly thankful, for impariing such valuable Secrets to me.
As I have been follicitous to obviste all Objections ; so have I been designedly brief in the positive Part: concerning which, as I am perfuaded I have said enough ; so I was unwilling to say more than was indispensably necessary. 'Twill not be expected there.
fore, that I should heap up all those Arguments, which have been urged by former Writers ; or that I bould insist upon all those Texts, wherein the Same Doctrin is contained.
This Method I have purposely chosein, that I might not expose the Doctor and my self to infinit Wranglings, which do rather obscure, than confirm, the most important Truths, with respect to the Generality of People; who are rather confounded, than instructed, by a Multiplicity of Reasonings, guarded as gainst numberless Exceptions, thro' the whole Course of which 'tis difficult for those who have not very trong Heads, to see every Consequence clearly, and upon the Whole to form an exact Judgment. "
I have therefore proceeded in such a manner, and selected such Topics, as will (I hope, thro? God's Allift ance) not perplex the meaneft, but yet convince. the best Understandings ; such as will not embarrass: any, but yet satisfy every Reader."
Briefly, if thosé Arguments which I have pitched upon, be conclusive ; the Cause will not suffer for want of others to accompany them : and if those Arguments are not conclusive, I must for my self confess, that I know of none which have more Force in
O&tob. 23. 1717.
St. Giles's Cripplegate, and Sold by W. Innys at the
Prince's Arms in St. Paul's Church-Yard. A N Abridgment of the London Cases. The Fifth Edition.
A Confutation of Popery, in Three Parts. The Fourch Edition.
Devotions: viz. Confessions, Petitions, Intercessions and Thanksgivings, for every Day in the Week : and also Before, · At, and After the Sacrament; with Occasional Prayers for all Persons whatsoever.
A Discourse of Schism. The Fourth Edition. . A Defence of the Discourse of Schism. The Fourth Edition.
An Answer to Mr. Shepherd's Considerations on the Defence of the Discourse of Schism. The Fourth Edition.
A Confutation of Quakerism. The Second Edicion.
A Discourse of the Necessity of being Baptiz'd with Water, and receiving the Lord's Supper ; taken out of the Confutation of Quakerism. Price 3 d. or 20 s. a ico.
A brief History of the joint Use of precomposed fet Forms of Prayer. The Second Edition.
A Discourse of joint Prayer. The Second Edition.
A Paraphrase with Annotations upon the Book of Common Prayer, wherein the Text is explain'd, Objections are answer'd, and Advice is humbly offer'd both to the Clergy and the Layety, for promoting true Devotion in the Use of it. The Second Edition.
Charity Schools recommended in a Sermon preach'd at St. James's Church in Colchester, on Sunday March 26. 1710. Published at the Request of the Trustees. The Second Edition. Pr. 1 d.
A Letter to Mr. B. Robinson, occasion'd by his Review of the Case of Liturgies and their Impofition.
A second Letter to Mr. B. Robinson on the same Subject.
Directions for studying, I. A general System or Body of Di. vinity. II. The Thirty-nine Articles of Religion. To which is added, St. Jerom's Epistle to Nepotianus. The Second Edicion.
An Essay on the Thirty-nine Articles of Religion.
The Nonjurors Separation from the Public Allemblys of the Church of England examin'd, and prov'd to be Schismatical up. on their own Principles. The Second Edition.
The Case of the Reform'd Episcopal Churches in Great Poland and Polish Pruffia consider'd, in a Sermon preach'd on Sunday Nov. 18. 1716. at St. Laurence Jewry, London, in che Morning, and St. Olave's Southwark, in the Afternoon. The Second Edition.
A Spiccal Sermon preach'd before the Lord Mayor, Alderpen, dr. of London, in St. Bridger's Church, on April 24. 1717.