Sharing Cities: A Case for Truly Smart and Sustainable CitiesHow cities can build on the “sharing economy” and smart technology to deliver a “sharing paradigm” that supports justice, solidarity, and sustainability. The future of humanity is urban, and the nature of urban space enables, and necessitates, sharing—of resources, goods and services, experiences. Yet traditional forms of sharing have been undermined in modern cities by social fragmentation and commercialization of the public realm. In Sharing Cities, Duncan McLaren and Julian Agyeman argue that the intersection of cities' highly networked physical space with new digital technologies and new mediated forms of sharing offers cities the opportunity to connect smart technology to justice, solidarity, and sustainability. McLaren and Agyeman explore the opportunities and risks for sustainability, solidarity, and justice in the changing nature of sharing. McLaren and Agyeman propose a new “sharing paradigm,” which goes beyond the faddish “sharing economy”—seen in such ventures as Uber and TaskRabbit—to envision models of sharing that are not always commercial but also communal, encouraging trust and collaboration. Detailed case studies of San Francisco, Seoul, Copenhagen, Medellín, Amsterdam, and Bengaluru (formerly Bangalore) contextualize the authors' discussions of collaborative consumption and production; the shared public realm, both physical and virtual; the design of sharing to enhance equity and justice; and the prospects for scaling up the sharing paradigm though city governance. They show how sharing could shift values and norms, enable civic engagement and political activism, and rebuild a shared urban commons. Their case for sharing and solidarity offers a powerful alternative for urban futures to conventional “race-to-the-bottom” narratives of competition, enclosure, and division. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 94
Earlier scholars equated culture with the symbolic; that which is outside politics, society, or economy; yet Hall focused on power, on the ways dominant groups engineer cultural consent to legitimate their hegemony and the ways in which ...
... of its ability to constantly shift its development between different arenas of production and reproduction.36 Harvey is talking of “capital” as an actor or interest group; we use the term throughout this book in the same sense.
It can also be seen as a distinction between learned behaviors and those that are more an expression of our evolved tendencies for cooperation in groups. The other dimension is about why we share, and the motivations of the participants ...
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
What people are saying - Write a review
Contents
1 | |
21 | |
The City as Platform | 27 |
Seoul | 71 |
The City as Collective Commons | 78 |
Copenhagen | 137 |
The City as Public Realm | 144 |
Medellín | 191 |
Amsterdam | 247 |
Understanding and Acting on the Sharing | 252 |
Bengaluru | 311 |
Synthesis | 317 |
Notes | 327 |
Bibliography | 411 |
Index | 423 |
Series List | 446 |
Other editions - View all
Sharing Cities: A Case for Truly Smart and Sustainable Cities Duncan McLaren,Julian Agyeman Limited preview - 2015 |
Sharing Cities: A Case for Truly Smart and Sustainable Cities Duncan McLaren,Julian Agyeman No preview available - 2017 |
Sharing Cities: A Case for Truly Smart and Sustainable Cities Duncan McLaren,Julian Agyeman No preview available - 2015 |