Reforming Parliamentary DemocracyF. Leslie Seidle, David Campbell Docherty Parliamentary government combines stability and dynamism. Its continuity is rooted in enduring principles such as citizen representation and accountability to the legislature. But parliamentary systems have evolved in response to changes in the societies they govern and in citizens' views about democratic practices. In Reforming Parliamentary Democracy the authors demonstrate how, in their respective countries, parliamentary governments have combined stability with the capacity to adapt to such changes. They provide insightful analyses of recent reforms to parliamentary institutions and governance in Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. The authors address issues of representation – the move to a proportional electoral system in New Zealand, the unsuccessful attempt to establish a domestic head of state in Australia, and the reform of the British House of Lords – and demonstrate that citizens increasingly want legislative institutions to more closely reflect the societies they serve. To discuss responsiveness, the governance of indigenous communities and their place within the broader society in Canada and New Zealand are examined, as is the role of institutions other than legislatures that are involved in protecting minority rights and responding to various forms of diversity. A separate chapter analyses the basis for and merits of proposals to reform the Canadian House of Commons. In addition, authors review the dynamics of federalism, intergovernmental relations, and other processes of multi-level governance in Canada, the United Kingdom, and South Africa. Public debate about adapting governance processes to changing conditions and citizen values is a necessary condition of successful democracies and there is much to learn from progress and false starts in other parliamentary democracies. Contributors include Jonathan Boston (Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand), Paul Chartrand (consultant, Victoria, British Columbia), Stéphane Dion (minister of Intergovernmental Relations, Government of Canada), David Docherty, Mason Durie (Massey University), Robert Hazell (University College London), Christina Murray (University of Cape Town), Cheryl Saunders (University of Melbourne), Leslie Seidle, Jennifer Smith (Dalhousie University), and Lord Wakeham (former chairman of the Royal Commission on House of Lords Reform). |
Contents
Introduction | 3 |
REPRESENTATION | 21 |
Democracy New Zealands Experience of Electoral Reform | 25 |
Act I | 56 |
Solving the Conundrum of Second Chamber Reform in the United Kingdom | 83 |
RESPONSIVENESS | 95 |
From Dominion to Condominium | 99 |
Parliament Statutory Recognition and the State Sector | 128 |
Debating the Reform of Canadas Parliament | 150 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Aboriginal Aboriginal rights Aboriginal self-government appointed Australian bills British cabinet Canada Canadian cent chapter Charlottetown Accord citizens coalition committee countries courts Crown debate delegates democratic devolution devolved direct election effective Electoral Reform electoral system established executive federal governor-general House of Commons House of Lords Indian initial institutions intergovernmental relations issues Jonathan Boston Labour leaders legislative process Lijphart Lord Wakeham majoritarian majority Mäori Mäori interests Mäori participation Mäori seats ment Métis minority National Assembly national government NCOP negotiations Nisga'a parlia parliamentary democracy parliamentary government population prime minister principles proportional representation proposals provinces provincial legislatures Quebec referendum reformed House regional Report representative republic responsible government role Royal Commission Scotland Scottish Parliament second chamber Senate significant South African Stéphane Dion tion Treaty of Waitangi United Kingdom vote voters Wales Wellington Westminster systems Zealand