Enquiring about everywhere for her love, 'But here, in this place, I will now be confined; To see him sometimes, though he thinks not of me, Now, while in the city fair Ruth did reside, As he was expressing his piteous moan, Fair Ruth came unto him, and made herself known; Said he, 'Now my sorrows are mingled with joy!' PART IV. When over the seas to fair Sandwich he came, Now, when that they took up their lodgings, behold And presently borrows a mariner's suit, That he with her parents might have some dispute, Before they were sensible he was so great; We have not heard of her a twelvemonth at most! Fair Ruth, with her love, was as gay as the rest, As fearing, alas! we should see thee no more.' 'Dear parents,' said she, ' many hazards I run, To fetch home my love, and your dutiful son; THE BERKSHIRE LADY'S GARLAND. IN FOUR PARTS. To the tune of The Royal Forester. [WHEN we first met with this very pleasing English ballad, we deemed the story to be wholly fictitious, but 'strange' as the ' relation 'may appear, the incidents narrated are 'true' or at least founded on fact. The scene of the ballad is Whitley Park, near Reading, in Berkshire, and not, as some suppose, Calcot House, which was not built till 1759. Whitley is mentioned by Leland as the Abbot's Park, being at the entrance of Redding town.' At the Dissolution the estate passed to the crown, and the mansion seems, from time to time, to have been used as a royal 'palace' till the reign of Elizabeth, by whom it was granted, along with the estate, to Sir Francis Knollys; it became afterwards, by purchase, the property of the Kendricks, an ancient race, descended from the Saxon kings. William Kendrick, of Whitley, armr. was created a baronet in 1679, and died in 1685, leaving issue one son, Sir William Kendrick, of Whitley, Bart., who married Miss Mary House, of Reading, and died in 1699, without issue male, leaving an only daughter. It was this rich heiress, who possessed 'store of wealth and beauty bright,' that is the heroine of the ballad. She married Benjamin Child, Esq., a young and handsome, but very poor attorney of Reading, and the marriage is traditionally reported to have been brought about exactly as related in the ballad. We have not been able to ascertain the exact date of the marriage, which was celebrated in St. Mary's Church, Reading, the bride wearing a thick veil; but the ceremony must have taken place some time about 1705. In 1714, Mr. Child was high sheriff of Berkshire. As he was an humble and obscure personage previously to his espousing the heiress of Whitley, and, in fact, owed all his wealth and influence to his marriage, it cannot be supposed that immediately after his union he would be elevated to so important and dignified a post as the highshrievalty of the very aristocratical county of Berks. We may, therefore, consider nine or ten years to have elapsed betwixt his marriage and his holding the office of high sheriff, which he filled when he was about thirty-two years of age. The author of the ballad is unknown: supposing him to have composed it shortly after the events which he records, we cannot be for wrong in fixing its date about 1706. The earliest broadside we have seen contains a rudely executed, but by no means bad likeness of Queen Anne, the reigning monarch at that period.] PART I. SHOWING CUPID'S CONQUEST OVER A COY LADY OF BACHELORS of every station, Mark this strange and true relation, Which in brief to you I bring,— You shall find it worth the hearing; Such a noble disposition Had this lady, with submission, Though she had vast store of riches, Near the famous town of Redding,* As she viewed his sweet behaviour, Forced she was to seek relief. Privately she then enquired PART II. SHOWING THE LADY'S LETTER OF A CHALLENGE TO FIGHT HIM UPON HIS REFUSING TO WED HER IN A MASK, WITHOUT KNOWING WHO SHE WAS. Night and morning, for a season, This is the ancient way of spelling the name of Reading. In Percy's version of Barbara Allen, that ballad commences In Scarlet town,' which, in the common stall copies, is rendered In Redding town.' The former is apparently a pun upon the old orthographyRedding. |