The Dubious Spectacle: Extremities of Theater, 1976-2000Spanning a quarter of a century, the essays in this book rehearse, in the movement of memory and cross-reflection, an extensive career in theater. The work of Herbert Blau-his directing, writing, and criticism-has been a determining force during this period as theater encounters theory. Blau's struggle to bring a critical intelligence to the American stage goes back half a century, to the quiescent postwar years (which he has eloquently described in The Impossible Theater: A Manifesto). His innovations in performance began with early productions of now-canonical plays that were hardly known at that time (works by Brecht, Beckett, Genet, Pinter, Duerrenmatt, and others). His experience is as distinctive as his versatile habits of mind and conceptual urgency of style. If the impossible takes a little time (as the title of one essay states), Blau's struggle now continues in a theoretical vein. Performance-and his own compelling writing- has moved across other genres and disciplines into fashion, politics, sexuality, and theory. His diversity of thought is demonstrated here in commentaries about the newer modes of performance (including conceptual and body art), various American playwrights, Renaissance drama, new music and theater, voice, the senses and the baroque, and the photographic image. As the essays reflect upon each other, a kind of cultural history, with inflections of autobiography, develops-which is what readers of Blau's previous books have come to expect. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 45
... ideology , merely another ap- pearance ? As I have asked in other books , how seriously are we to take the persistent themes of the canonical drama , that all the world's a stage or that life is a dream or that , seek for truth as we ...
... ideological . What can one say ? Here the imprinted residue may be that of high modernism , where imagination goes with conceptual rigor too , as in the photographic Equivalents of Alfred Stieglitz , which appear to bring the senses ...
... ideological end ? as well as the potentially dishearten- ing question : what difference does it make ? Whether or not it made a difference , those questions took on a phan- tasmaphysical aspect in the methodology of KRAKEN , a process ...
... ideological take on the sta- tus of the aesthetic , to which I turned at one point in responding to the questions . About my collaborators on the opera , one thing is sure : their " bloodlines are decidedly of the avant - garde ...
... ideology , family and nation , freedom and imperatives , sub- ject and object .... " Yet , with faith so foundering , will miracles never cease ? For in its exhaustive enumeration of the exhaustion of value , its apparently Afterthought ...
Contents
Theater at the End of the Real | 9 |
2 The Impossible Takes a Little Time | 26 |
3 Spacing Out in the American Theater | 45 |
Rehearsing the Resistance | 61 |
5 A Dove in My Chimney | 70 |
An Analytic Scenario | 78 |
The Grail of the Voice | 126 |
Chills and Fever Mourning and the Vanities of the Sublime | 140 |
13 Readymade Desire | 207 |
From Tango Palace to Mud | 214 |
The Group Idea and Its Legacy | 223 |
New Music and Theater | 238 |
17 FlatOut Vision | 254 |
Sovereign Pleasure and the Baroque Subject in the Tragicomedies of John Fletcher | 273 |
Revising the Abyss | 289 |
The Insane Root | 315 |
9 The Dubious Spectacle of Collective Identity | 145 |
Subtext of a Syllabus for the Arts in America | 165 |
Educating the American Theater | 189 |
12 The Pipe Dreams of ONeill in the Age of Deconstruction | 197 |
Notes | 329 |
343 | |
345 | |