...Wil-son v. Brett (14), Rolfe, B. said, " I said I could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence ; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet" [WILLES, J. — In Beal v. the South Devon Railway Company (15), a definition of "gross negligence"...

...same Court, Rolfe, B., remarks, — " I said I could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence — that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet." 3 , § 24. If the subject-matter of the bailment consists of living animals, such as oxen, horses,...

...same Court, Rolfe, B., remarks, — " I said I could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence — that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet." 2 § 24. If the subject-matter of the bailment consists of living animals, such as oxen, horses, or...

...& Wels. 113,) Baron Rolfe observes, " that he could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence ; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet." And see Hare and Wallace's American note, p. 242, with the American cases there cited, and which are...

...to possess; and ROLFE, В., observes that he could see no difference between négligence and gross negligence, — that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet. See also the remarks of PARKE, В., in Wyld v. Pickford, 8 Id. 443, 461, 462, and of LordUENMAN, CJ,...

...Meeson & Welsby, 113, Baron IIolfe declared he could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence ; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet. And in another case, — Hinton v. Dibbin, 2 Queen's Bench, 650, — Lord Denman said: "It may well...

...in Wilson v. Brett (d) Rolfs B. said that he " could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence — that it was the same thing with the addition of a vituperative epithet." And this seems to be confirmed by the language of the Court in Austin v. Tlie Mancliester, §-e. Railway...

...pertinent remarks upon this subject. " I said I could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence, that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet," And in Austin v. The Manchester RR 11 Eng. L. & Eq. 513, Cresswell, J. refers to the language of Lord...

...pertinent remarks upon this subject. " I said I could see no difference between negligence and grots negligence, that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet." And in Austin r. The Manchester RR 11 Eng. L. & Eq. 513, Cresswell, J., refers to the language of Lord...

...v. Brett (b), objected to it, saying that he " could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence ; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet." And this critical observation has been since approved of by other eminent Judges. Of course, if intended...