Court: secondly, that the judgment of a Court of exclusive jurisdiction directly upon the point, is in like manner conclusive upon the same matter, between the same parties, coming incidentally in question in another Court, for a different purpose. But... The Law of Evidence Applicable to British India - Page 285by Syed Ameer Ali, Sir John George Woodroffe - 1898 - 1092 pagesFull view - About this book
| Sir John Joseph Dillon - Great Britain - 1811 - 214 pages
...tion, directly upon the point, is conclusive 44 upon the same matter between the same parties, E 2 " coming incidentally in question in another " Court...purpose. But neither the " judgment of a concurrent nor exclusive juris" diction, is evidence of any matter to be infer" red by argument from that judgment"... | |
| Thomas Bayly Howell - Trials - 1814 - 730 pages
...upon the point, is, in like manner, conclusive upon the same matter, between the same parties, coining incidentally in question in another court, for a different...their jurisdiction ; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable ; nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from tbe judgment Upon the subject of marriage,... | |
| Samuel March Phillipps - Evidence (Law) - 1815 - 600 pages
...jurisdiction, directly upon the point, is conclusive, between the same parties, upon the same matter coming incidentally in question in another court for a different purpose : but that the judgment either of a court of concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is not evidence of any... | |
| Trials - 1816 - 724 pages
...judgment of a court of exclusive jurisdiction, directly upon the point, is, in like manner, conclusive upon the same matter, between the same parties, coming...their jurisdiction ; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable ; nor, of any matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment. Upon the subject of marriage,... | |
| Samuel March Phillipps - Evidence (Law) - 1816 - 746 pages
...different purpose ; but that the judgment either of a court of concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is not evidence of any matter, which came collaterally in question, though within their )iiri«dicfion, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred by argument... | |
| United States. Circuit Court (1st Circuit), John Gallison - Law reports, digests, etc - 1817 - 624 pages
...judgment of a court of exclusive jurisdiction, directly upon the point, is, in like manner, conclusive upon the same matter, between the same parties, coming...concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is evidence of any Harvey vs. Richards. matter, which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction,... | |
| Francis Buller - Actions and defenses - 1817 - 684 pages
...between the same partics coming incidentally in question in another court for a different purpose, yet neither the judgment of a concurrent or exclusive...collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction, nur of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred by agreement from the judgment.... | |
| William Cruise - Real property - 1818 - 648 pages
...judgment of a court of exclusive jurisdiction, directly upon the point, is, in like manner, conclusive., upon the same matter, between the same parties, coming...their jurisdiction; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable; nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment." These rules are laid down... | |
| William Cruise - Real property - 1818 - 648 pages
...judgment of a court of exclusive jurisdiction, directly up<» the point, is, in like manner, conclusive, upon the same matter, between the same parties, coming...collaterally in question, though, within their jurisdiction j nor of any matter incidentally cognizable ; nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from the... | |
| Matthew Hale - Civil law - 1820 - 582 pages
...judgment of a court of exclusive jurisdiction, directly upon the point, is, in like manner, conclusive upon the same matter, between the same parties, coming...exclusive jurisdiction, is evidence of any matter which carte collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable... | |
| |