(Which from the stubborn stone a torrent rends) The image of a falling rock is certainly not ele. vating;* and yet undoubtedly the foregoing simile fires and swells the mind: it is grand therefore, if not sublime. And the following simile will afford additional evidence, that there is a real, though nice, distinction between these two feelings: So saying, a noble stroke he lifted high, Milton, b. vi. A comparison by contrast may contribute to grandeur or elevation, no less than by resemblance; of which the following comparison of Lucan is a re. markable instance: Victrix causa diis placuit, sed victa Catoni. Considering that the Heathen deities possessed a rank but one degree above that of mankind, I think it would not be easy by a single expression, to exalt more one of the human species, than is done in this comparison. I am sensible, at the same time, that such a comparison among Christians, who entertain more exalted notions of the Deity, would justly be reckoned extravagant and absurd. The last article mentioned, is that of lessening or depressing a hated or disagreeable object; which is effectually done by resembling it to any thing low or despicable. Thus Milton, in his description of the rout of the rebel-angels, happily expresses their terror and dismay in the following simile: As a herd Of goats or timorous flock together throng'd, Milton, b. vi. In the same view, Homer, I think, may be justified In comparing the shouts of the Trojans in battle to the noise of cranes,* and to the bleating of a flock of sheep it is no objection that these are low images; for it was his intention to lessen the Trojans by opposing their noisy march to the silent and manly march of the Greeks. Addison,‡ describing the figure that men make in the sight of a superior being, takes opportunity to mortify their pride by comparing them to a swarm of pismires. A comparison that has none of the good effects mentioned in this discourse, but is built upon common and trifling circumstances, makes a mighty silly figure : * Beginning of book iii. † Book iv. 1. 498 Non sum nescius, grandia consilia a multis plerumque caúsis, ceu magna navigia a plurimis remis, impelli. Strada, de bello Belgico. By this time, I imagine the different purposes of comparison, and the various impressions it makes on the mind, are sufficiently illustrated by proper examples. This was an easy task. It is more difficult to lay down rules about the propriety or impropriety of comparisons; in what circumstances they may be introduced, and in what circumstances they are out of place. It is evident, that a comparison is not proper on every occasion: a man when cool and sedate, is not disposed to poetical flights, nor to sacrifice truth and reality to imaginary beauties: far less is he so disposed when oppressed with care, or interested in some important transaction that engrosses him totally. On the other hand, a man, when elevated or animated by passion, is disposed to elevate or animate all his objects: he avoids familiar names, exalts objects by circumlocution and metaphor, and gives even life and voluntary action to inanimate beings. In this heat of mind, the highest poetical flights are indulged, and the boldest similes and metaphors relished.* But without soaring so high, the mind is frequently in a tone to relish chaste and moderate ornament; such as comparisons that set the principal object in a strong point of view, or that embellish and diversify the narration. In general, when by any animating passion, whether pleasant or painful, an impulse is given to the imagination; we are in that condition disposed to every sort of figurative expression, and in particular to comparisons. This in a great measure is evident from the comparisons already mentioned; and shall be further illustrated • It is accordingly observed by Longinus, in his Treatise of the Sublime, that the proper time for metaphor, is when the passions are so swelled as to hurry on like a torrent. by other instances. Love, for example, in its infancy, rousing the imagination, prompts the heart to display itself in figurative language, and in similes : Troilus. Tell me, Apollo, for thy Daphne's love, Again : Troilus and Cressida, Act 1. Sc. 1. Come, gentle Night; come, loving black-brow'd Night! Take him, and cut him out in little stars, Romeo and Juliet, Act III. Sc. 4. The dread of a misfortune, however imminent, involving always some doubt and uncertainty, agitates the mind and excites the imagination: Wolsey. -Nay, then, farewel: I've touch'd the highest point of all my greatness, I haste now to my setting. I shall fall, Like a bright exhalation in the evening, And no man see me more. Henry VIII. Act III. Sc. 4. But it will be a better illustration of the present head, to give examples where comparisons are improperly introduced. I have had already occasion to observe, that similes are not the language of a man in his ordinary state of mind, despatching his daily and usual work. For that reason, the following speech of a gardener to his servants, is extremely improper: 1 Go, bind-thou up yon dangling apricots, Cut off the heads of too fast growing sprays, Richard II. Act III. Sc. 7. The fertility of Shakspeare's vein betrays him frequently into this error. There is the same impropriety in another simile of his : Hero. Good Margaret, run thee into the parlour; Much ado about Nothing, Açt III. Sc. 1. Rooted grief, deep anguish, terror, remorse, despair, and all the severe dispiriting passions, are declared enemies, perhaps not to figurative language in general, but undoubtedly to the pomp and solemnity of comparison. Upon that account, the simile pronounced by young Rutland, under a terror of death from an inveterate enemy, and praying mercy, is unnatural: So looks the pent-up lion o'er the wretch Third Part, Henry VI. Act L. Sc. 5. Nothing appears more out of place, nor more awkwardly introduced, than the following simile: |