I Am He: The Interpretation of A̓n H ̓in Jewish and Early Christian Literature

Front Cover
Mohr Siebeck, 2000 - Religion - 408 pages
New Testament scholars often claim that the interpretative key to Jesus' pronouncement of the words ego eimi in the Gospel of John lies in the use of this phrase in the Septuagint of Isaiah to render the Hebrew expression 'ani hu' . While previous studies have paid particular attention to the New Testament usage of ego eimi, Catrin H. Williams sets this evidence within a broader framework by offering a detailed analysis of the interpretation of 'ani hu' in biblical and Jewish traditions. She examines the role of 'ani hu' as a succinct expression of God's claim to exclusiveness in the Song of Moses and the poetry of Deutero-Isaiah, and attempts to reconstruct its later interpretative history from the substantial body of evidence preserved in the Aramaic Targumim and several midrashic traditions. Biblical 'ani hu' declarations are cited by rabbinic authorities as proof-texts against a variety of heretical claims, particularly the 'two powers' heresy, but new 'ani hu' formulations, not necessarily confined to divine speeches, are also attested. In the concluding chapters Catrin H. Williams considers the role of 'ani hu' when seeking to interpret Jesus' utterance of the words ego eimi in Synoptic and Johannine traditions.

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


The Interpretation of 17 NI8in the Targumim
The Hebrew Bible and x 17
Textual Traditions and Ancient Versions
Rabbinic Interpretations of 817 8 The Use of Deut 3239
Rabbinic Interpretations of 8977 X SelfDeclarations by
The Eternal Steadfastness of
The Interpretation of y eiui in the Gospel of Mark
Concluding Remarks

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2000)

Catrin H Williams, Born 1964; 1985 B.A. in Biblical Studies at the University of Wales, Bangor; 1996 Ph.D. University of Cambridge; since 1988 lecturer in New Testament Studies at the University of Wales , Bangor.

Bibliographic information