...prevent acquittal.47 What few experiments have occurred — usually in the civil area — indicate that there is no discernible difference between the results reached by the two different-sized juries." In short, neither currently available evidence nor theory49 suggests that...

...trial. We said: "What few experiments have occurred — usually in the civil area — indicate that there is no discernible difference between the results reached by the two different-sized juries. In short, neither currently available evidence nor theory suggests that the...

...studies have provided convincing empirical evidence of the correctness of the WttHams conclusion thnt 'there Is no discernible difference between the results reached by the two different-sized juries.' Note, Six-Member and Twelve-Member Juries : An Empirical Study of Trial Results....

...White, writing for the majority, noted that "[w]hat few experiments have occurred . . . indicate that there is no discernible difference between the results reached by the two different-sized [6-man and 12-man] juries," id. at 101, citing six sources which were not based on...

...opinion wrote that the specific number "twelve" was without significance except to mystics and "that there is no discernible difference between the results reached by the two different sized juries" (six and twelve). The Court did not in Williams v. Florida specify a constitutionally acceptable minimum...