 | Joseph Chitty - Fisheries - 1812 - 760 pages
...third person, then it is the hunter's."Lord Ellenborough, CJ The question is, whether the plaintiff's dog incurred the penalty of death for running after a hare in another ground ? And if there be any precedent of that sort, which outrages all reason O) Cro. Jac.... | |
 | Edward Christian - Game laws - 1817 - 374 pages
...owner to pursue the Game. And Lord Ellenborough observed, The question is, whether the t plaintiff's dog incurred the penalty of death for running after...another's ground ? And if there be any precedent of that sort, which outrages all reason and sense, it is of no authority to govern other cases. There is no... | |
 | William Selwyn - Nisi prius - 1817 - 782 pages
...Buller,J. So- 1 1 East, 56s. Ellen-borough, CJ observing, " The question is, whether the plaintiffs dog incurred the penalty of death for running after a hare in another's ground ? There is no question here as to the right to the game. The gamekeeper had no right to kill the plaintiff's... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Bayly Moore - Law reports, digests, etc - 1818 - 636 pages
...the proposition I am now maintaining. His lordship says, ' The question is, whether the plaintiff's dog incurred the penalty of death for running after...another's ground ; and if there be any precedent of that sort, which outrages all reason and sense, it is of no authority to govern other cases. There is no... | |
 | Richard Burn - Justices of the peace - 1820 - 880 pages
...demurrer; and after argument, Lord Ellenborough, C. 3. said, The question is, whether the plaintiff's <l'>g incurred the penalty of death for running after a...another's ground ? And if there be any precedent of that sort, which outrages all reason and sense, it is of no authority to govern other case«. There is no... | |
 | Richard Burn - Justices of the peace - 1830 - 1078 pages
...demurrer : and after argument, Lord Ellenborough CJsaid, — The question is, Whether the plaintiff's dog incurred the penalty of death for running after...another's ground ? And if there be any precedent of that sort, which outrages all reason and sense, it is of no authority to govern other cases. There is no... | |
 | Charles Petersdorff - Law - 1831 - 542 pages
...Ellenborough, mast ap CJ , observing, " The question is, whether the plaintiff's dog incurred the pear in the penalty of death for running after a hare in another's ground? There is noPleadlnes question here us to the right to the game. The game-keeper had no right toVat... | |
 | James Ram - Judgments - 1835 - 162 pages
...defendant's gamekeeper had shot a dog of the plaintiff, and the question was, "whether the plaintiff's dog incurred the penalty of death for running after a hare in another's ground;" Lord Ellenborough forcibly said, — " If there be any precedent of that sort, which outrages all reason... | |
 | Law - 1869 - 552 pages
...LordEllenborough, in giving judgment, said : " The question is whether the plaintiff s dog incurred tho penalty of death for running after a hare in another's ground — and if there bo any precedent of that sort, which outrages all reason and sense, it is of no authority to govern... | |
 | Thomas Burgeland Johnson - Great Britain - 1848 - 1102 pages
...demurrer ; and after argument, Lord Ellenborough, JC said, the question is, whether the plaintiff's dog incurred the penalty of death for running after...another's ground ? And if there be any precedent of that sort, which outrages all reason and sense, it is of no authority to govern other cases. There is no... | |
| |
The question is, Whether the plaintiff's dog incurred the penalty of death for running after a hare in another's ground ? And if there be any precedent of that sort, which outrages all reason and sense, it is of no authority to govern other cases. 
