Liberalism and the Limits of JusticeA liberal society seeks not to impose a single way of life, but to leave its citizens as free as possible to choose their own values and ends. It therefore must govern by principles of justice that do not presuppose any particular vision of the good life. But can any such principles be found? And if not, what are the consequences for justice as a moral and political ideal? These are the questions Michael Sandel takes up in this penetrating critique of contemporary liberalism. This new edition includes a new introduction and a new final chapter in which Professor Sandel responds to the later work of John Rawls. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 86
Page x
... notion that justice is relative to the good , not independent of it , connects LLJ to writings by others commonly identified as the ' communitarian critics ' of liberalism . But there are two versions of the claim that justice is ...
... notion that justice is relative to the good , not independent of it , connects LLJ to writings by others commonly identified as the ' communitarian critics ' of liberalism . But there are two versions of the claim that justice is ...
Page 7
... notion of the subject - one epistemological , the other practical . Both are forms of ' transcenden- tal ' arguments , in that they proceed by seeking out the presupposi- tions of certain apparently indispensable features of our ...
... notion of the subject - one epistemological , the other practical . Both are forms of ' transcenden- tal ' arguments , in that they proceed by seeking out the presupposi- tions of certain apparently indispensable features of our ...
Page 9
... notion of a subject prior to and independent of experience , such as the deontological ethic requires , appears not only possible but indispensable , a necessary presupposi- tion of the possibility of self - knowledge and of freedom ...
... notion of a subject prior to and independent of experience , such as the deontological ethic requires , appears not only possible but indispensable , a necessary presupposi- tion of the possibility of self - knowledge and of freedom ...
Page 12
... notion of independence . If it means to offer a psychological objection , then it cannot reach the deontological view , which makes an epistemological claim . The independence of the subject does not mean that I can , as a psychological ...
... notion of independence . If it means to offer a psychological objection , then it cannot reach the deontological view , which makes an epistemological claim . The independence of the subject does not mean that I can , as a psychological ...
Page 14
... notions of auton- omy and the categorical imperative . In this way the underlying structure of Kant's doctrine is detached from its metaphysical surroundings so that it can be seen more clearly and presented relatively free from ...
... notions of auton- omy and the categorical imperative . In this way the underlying structure of Kant's doctrine is detached from its metaphysical surroundings so that it can be seen more clearly and presented relatively free from ...
Contents
Justice and the Moral Subject | 15 |
THE ORIGINAL POSITION | 24 |
EMPIRICIST OBJECTIONS | 28 |
DEONTOLOGICAL REJOINDER | 40 |
IN SEARCH OF THE MORAL SUBJECT | 47 |
THE PRIORITY OF PLURALITY | 50 |
THE SUBJECT OF POSSESSION | 54 |
INDIVIDUALISM AND THE CLAIMS OF COMMUNITY | 60 |
Justice and the Good | 133 |
THE CASE OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION | 135 |
THREE CONCEPTIONS OF COMMUNITY | 147 |
AGENCY AND THE ROLE OF REFLECTION | 154 |
AGENCY AND THE ROLE OF CHOICE | 161 |
THE STATUS OF THE GOOD | 165 |
THE MORAL EPISTEMOLOGY OF JUSTICE | 168 |
JUSTICE AND COMMUNITY | 172 |
Possession Desert and Distributive Justice | 66 |
MERITOCRACY VERSUS THE DIFFERENCE PRINCIPLE | 72 |
DEFENDING COMMON ASSETS | 77 |
THE BASIS OF DESERT | 82 |
Who Owns What? | 95 |
Contract Theory and Justification | 104 |
THE MORALITY OF CONTRACT | 105 |
CONTRACTS VERSUS CONTRACTARIAN ARGUMENTS | 109 |
LIBERALISM AND THE PRIORITY OF PROCEDURE | 113 |
WHAT REALLY GOES ON BEHIND THE VEIL OF IGNORANCE | 122 |
Liberalism and the Limits of Justice | 175 |
CHARACTER SELFKNOWLEDGE AND FRIENDSHIP | 178 |
A Response to Rawls Political Liberalism | 184 |
CONTESTING THE PRIORITY OF THE RIGHT OVER THE GOOD | 185 |
DEFENDING THE PRIORITY OF THE RIGHT OVER THE GOOD | 189 |
ASSESSING POLITICAL LIBERALISM | 195 |
219 | |
227 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affirm affirmative action agency agreement aims argue assess attributes basis benevolence bounds ception choice choose circumstances of justice claim common assets communitarian comprehensive moral conception of justice contingencies contract debate defined deontological ethic deontological liberalism depend desert difference principle distinction distributive justice doctrines Dworkin emphasis added empirical ends entitled epistemological equal essential fact of reasonable human Ibid ideal identity independent individualistic institutions interests justice as fairness Kant Kant's Kantian libertarian meritocracy moral and religious moral subject moral worth motivations mutual disinterest natural assets notion Nozick object original position particular parties person political conception political liberalism possible presuppose primacy of justice principles of justice procedural justice public reason question rational Rawls reasonable pluralism reflection reflective equilibrium relevant requires respect Ronald Dworkin seeks self-knowledge situation social subject of possession theory of justice tice tion unity utilitarian values veil of ignorance virtue voluntarist wants and desires