In Defense of HistoryE. H. Carr's What Is History?, a classic introduction to the field, may now give way to a worthy successor. In his compact, intriguing survey, Richard J. Evans shows us how historians manage to extract meaning from the recalcitrant past. To materials that are frustratingly meager, or overwhelmingly profuse, they bring an array of tools that range from agreed-upon rules of documentation and powerful computer models to the skilled investigator's sudden insight, all employed with the aim of reconstructing a verifiable, usable past. Evans defends this commitment to historical knowledge from the attacks of postmodernist critics who see all judgments as subjective. Evans brings "a remarkable range, a nose for the archives, a taste for controversy, and a fluent pen" (The New Republic) to this splendid work. "Essential reading for coming generations."-Keith Thomas |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 66
Page 1
... Carr and Sir Geoffrey Elton . E. H. Carr's What Is History ? has been wide- ly used as an introduction to historical study by teachers and students since its first publication in 1961 , and it is easy to see why . Carr was a practicing ...
... Carr and Sir Geoffrey Elton . E. H. Carr's What Is History ? has been wide- ly used as an introduction to historical study by teachers and students since its first publication in 1961 , and it is easy to see why . Carr was a practicing ...
Page 2
... Carr's relativistic approach to historical study , it is com- mon practice to pit G. R. Elton's The Practice of History , published in 1967. Elton's book mounts a trenchant defense of the belief that his- tory is a search for the ...
... Carr's relativistic approach to historical study , it is com- mon practice to pit G. R. Elton's The Practice of History , published in 1967. Elton's book mounts a trenchant defense of the belief that his- tory is a search for the ...
Page 3
... Carr , more obviously than the arrival in the 1980s of postmodernist theory , which has called into question many , if not most , of the argu- ments put forward by both of them . " Instead of causes , which Carr regarded as central to ...
... Carr , more obviously than the arrival in the 1980s of postmodernist theory , which has called into question many , if not most , of the argu- ments put forward by both of them . " Instead of causes , which Carr regarded as central to ...
Page 7
... Carr and Elton is a serious one . Some of the intellectual barbarians at the discipli- nary gates are loitering ... Carr's work pub- lished in 1995 : " We have reached the end of modernist versions of what history is . " " Patrick Joyce ...
... Carr and Elton is a serious one . Some of the intellectual barbarians at the discipli- nary gates are loitering ... Carr's work pub- lished in 1995 : " We have reached the end of modernist versions of what history is . " " Patrick Joyce ...
Page 8
... Carr and Elton wrote , and in the process it has developed its own concepts and its own jargon , which have made it often rather impenetrable to out- siders . Some have indeed argued that the nature of historical expla- nation is a ...
... Carr and Elton wrote , and in the process it has developed its own concepts and its own jargon , which have made it often rather impenetrable to out- siders . Some have indeed argued that the nature of historical expla- nation is a ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Abraham American historian American Historical Review Ankersmit Annales school approach argued argument Arthur Marwick belief Britain British Cambridge Carr's causes claim concept contemporary course critics critique cultural debate declared Deconstructing discipline discourse documents Dominick LaCapra E. H. Carr England English European evidence example Frank Ankersmit French G. M. Trevelyan Geoffrey Elton Hayden White historians historical fact historical knowledge historical profession historical research historical scholarship historical writing Historiography History and Post-Modernism History London Holocaust denial human Ibid ideas Intellectual History interpretation J. H. Hexter Journal Joyce Keith Jenkins kind LaCapra language Lawrence Stone linguistic turn literary Marxist meaning modern moral Moreover Munslow Namier narrative Novick objective Oxford past postmodernism postmodernist practice present Purkiss Revolution rians scientific sense Sir Geoffrey Elton Social History social sciences society sources theory things thought tion torians torical tory traditional Trevelyan truth written