In Defense of HistoryE. H. Carr's What Is History?, a classic introduction to the field, may now give way to a worthy successor. In his compact, intriguing survey, Richard J. Evans shows us how historians manage to extract meaning from the recalcitrant past. To materials that are frustratingly meager, or overwhelmingly profuse, they bring an array of tools that range from agreed-upon rules of documentation and powerful computer models to the skilled investigator's sudden insight, all employed with the aim of reconstructing a verifiable, usable past. Evans defends this commitment to historical knowledge from the attacks of postmodernist critics who see all judgments as subjective. Evans brings "a remarkable range, a nose for the archives, a taste for controversy, and a fluent pen" (The New Republic) to this splendid work. "Essential reading for coming generations."-Keith Thomas |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 37
Page 3
... causes , which Carr regarded as central to historical scholarship , the " linguistic turn " has given us discourses . History is widely argued to be only one dis- course among many . The notion of scientific history , based on the ...
... causes , which Carr regarded as central to historical scholarship , the " linguistic turn " has given us discourses . History is widely argued to be only one dis- course among many . The notion of scientific history , based on the ...
Page 11
... causes , let me refer to a case of an intellectual trend that swept all before it rather farther afield . In the 1920s and 1930s German historians overwhelmingly believed in the primacy of foreign policy in shaping a nation's histo- ry ...
... causes , let me refer to a case of an intellectual trend that swept all before it rather farther afield . In the 1920s and 1930s German historians overwhelmingly believed in the primacy of foreign policy in shaping a nation's histo- ry ...
Page 12
... caused some postmodernist theorists to shift their ground in crucial respects , just as historians themselves have been forced to shift their ground by postmodernist critiques . What we have , in other words , is no longer a dialogue of ...
... caused some postmodernist theorists to shift their ground in crucial respects , just as historians themselves have been forced to shift their ground by postmodernist critiques . What we have , in other words , is no longer a dialogue of ...
Page 21
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 28
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Abraham American historian American Historical Review Ankersmit Annales school approach argued argument Arthur Marwick belief Britain British Cambridge Carr's causes claim concept contemporary course critics critique cultural debate declared Deconstructing discipline discourse documents Dominick LaCapra E. H. Carr England English European evidence example Frank Ankersmit French G. M. Trevelyan Geoffrey Elton Hayden White historians historical fact historical knowledge historical profession historical research historical scholarship historical writing Historiography History and Post-Modernism History London Holocaust denial human Ibid ideas Intellectual History interpretation J. H. Hexter Journal Joyce Keith Jenkins kind LaCapra language Lawrence Stone linguistic turn literary Marxist meaning modern moral Moreover Munslow Namier narrative Novick objective Oxford past postmodernism postmodernist practice present Purkiss Revolution rians scientific sense Sir Geoffrey Elton Social History social sciences society sources theory things thought tion torians torical tory traditional Trevelyan truth written