In Defense of HistoryE. H. Carr's What Is History?, a classic introduction to the field, may now give way to a worthy successor. In his compact, intriguing survey, Richard J. Evans shows us how historians manage to extract meaning from the recalcitrant past. To materials that are frustratingly meager, or overwhelmingly profuse, they bring an array of tools that range from agreed-upon rules of documentation and powerful computer models to the skilled investigator's sudden insight, all employed with the aim of reconstructing a verifiable, usable past. Evans defends this commitment to historical knowledge from the attacks of postmodernist critics who see all judgments as subjective. Evans brings "a remarkable range, a nose for the archives, a taste for controversy, and a fluent pen" (The New Republic) to this splendid work. "Essential reading for coming generations."-Keith Thomas |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 69
Page 8
... presents more difficulties because it is no longer with us . Moreover , the theory and history of history have become a separate branch of learning in itself since Carr and Elton wrote , and in the process it has developed its own ...
... presents more difficulties because it is no longer with us . Moreover , the theory and history of history have become a separate branch of learning in itself since Carr and Elton wrote , and in the process it has developed its own ...
Page 14
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 15
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 19
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 24
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Abraham American historian American Historical Review Ankersmit Annales school approach argued argument Arthur Marwick belief Britain British Cambridge Carr's causes claim concept contemporary course critics critique cultural debate declared Deconstructing discipline discourse documents Dominick LaCapra E. H. Carr England English European evidence example Frank Ankersmit French G. M. Trevelyan Geoffrey Elton Hayden White historians historical fact historical knowledge historical profession historical research historical scholarship historical writing Historiography History and Post-Modernism History London Holocaust denial human Ibid ideas Intellectual History interpretation J. H. Hexter Journal Joyce Keith Jenkins kind LaCapra language Lawrence Stone linguistic turn literary Marxist meaning modern moral Moreover Munslow Namier narrative Novick objective Oxford past postmodernism postmodernist practice present Purkiss Revolution rians scientific sense Sir Geoffrey Elton Social History social sciences society sources theory things thought tion torians torical tory traditional Trevelyan truth written